Re: [Freeswitch-users] SLAs and BLAs

2009-10-11 Thread Brian West
No we do not issue a subscribe OUTBOUND. We work with Polycom, Snom and a few other that outbound subscribe is something we should do if we want to know you took the phone off hook. /b On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:23 AM, Jerry Richards wrote: I gather from the mailing archive that BLAs are

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SLAs and BLAs

2009-10-11 Thread Brian West
btw the polycom it will do the sub like you expect but the rest will only know when the phone is actually on a call or receiving a call... we won't know if the handset is taken off hook...I would like to rework the functionality similar to how sofia_sla.c handles it. Again if you want to

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SLAs and BLAs

2009-10-09 Thread Jerry Richards
implementation? Best Regards, Jerry -Original Message- From: Jerry Richards [mailto:jerry.richa...@teotech.com] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 3:24 PM To: 'freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org' Subject: RE: [Freeswitch-users] SLAs and BLAs We are building our own in-house developed Teo

[Freeswitch-users] SLAs and BLAs

2009-10-05 Thread Jerry Richards
I can see how BLFs and Presence are managed, however I haven't found much documentation on SLAs and BLAs. What is the RFC(s) that Freeswitch used to implement SLAs and BLAs? Do they differ from BLFs? Best Regards, Jerry ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SLAs and BLAs

2009-10-05 Thread Jerry Richards
:02 AM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] SLAs and BLAs First off what phones are you going to be using? /b On Oct 5, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Jerry Richards wrote: I can see how BLFs and Presence are managed, however I haven't found much documentation on SLAs