Matt
Porter
Sent: April-24-09 1:39 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
Ya i think there is definately a disconnect between the peer circles that
people run in.
There is major adoption of voicexml by the "big boys", who dont care if the
t
freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Onderwerp: Re:
[Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
Here is one editor to look into
http://www.eclipse.org/vtp/
-E
Gpro.ws
http://TwiTR.Me ? ? ?
? ?(Cross Social Network Messaging Bus)
http://WatchNtweet.Me (Watch and
Chat/Tweet) SocialTV
http://TwebEX.com ? ? (Twi
itch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
Here is one editor to look into
http://www.eclipse.org/vtp/
-E
Gpro.ws
http://TwiTR.Me (Cross Social Network Messaging Bus)
http://WatchNtweet.Me (Watch and Chat/Tweet) SocialTV
http://TwebEX.com (Twitter Based
Coincidentally (or not), Cisco's more high-end VRU Customer Voice Portal (CVP)
uses Eclipse for its VXML editing.
From: EdPimentl
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 9:10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
Here is one editor to look into
http://www.eclipse.org/vtp/
-E
Gpro.ws
http://TwiTR.Me (Cross Social Network Messaging Bus)
http://WatchNtweet.Me (Watch and Chat/Tweet) SocialTV
http://TwebEX.com (Twitter Based Online Web Conference Platform)
http://TweetUp.ws (Twitter based Me
I have worked with voxeo stuff in the past and also had good feelings about
the VXML approach. I have to say that the freeswitch approach seems to be
quite powerful, too, and much easier than doing IVR stuff in yate (that
requires php programming) but significantly less than using CallButler (it
pr
Ya i think there is definately a disconnect between the peer circles that
people run in.
There is major adoption of voicexml by the "big boys", who dont care if the
tool to generate voicexml costs money.. and between the smaller shops that
are sensitive to costs like that.
A key driver for voicexm
As opposed to what?!
I don't think anyone will claim that voicexml is super elegant... Only
that it sucks the least
On Apr 23, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
> mszlazak wrote:
>> If you don't like vxml then here is a post on voicePHP
>>
>> http://www.speechtechblog.com/2009/04/22/
Well if it's for marketing reasons then maybe that's why FS should do it.
After all, the idea is to get people to try something. Plus it is fast in
making up a dialogue so someone can quickly test if this will work for what
they want.
In a previous post, Steve said many don't use it but Voxeo Fo
Composing an ivr with a visual tool and rendering it into something
serialized that can be understood by many
things is a good idea but every time someone makes a go at an open standard
they don't present it with wide open
and free tools to make and use it which always ends up ruining everything.
mszlazak wrote:
> If you don't like vxml then here is a post on voicePHP
>
> http://www.speechtechblog.com/2009/04/22/voicexml-to-go-down-in-the-third-says-voicephp
>
> It's from a vendor but there might be some good ideas to get from what they
> are doing.
>
> FreeSWITCH needs demand to get vxml a
eeswitch.org
Sent: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 1:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM, mszlazak wrote:
If you don't like vxml then here is a post on voicePHP
http://www.speechtechblog.com/2009/04/22/voicexml-to-go-down-in-the-third-says-voice
Just sticking 'voice' in front of something doesn't automatically make
it a good tool for developing voice applications - there's more
marketing here than anything else. And it's not like adding extensions
to an existing language to provide IVR control is anything new: it's
exactly what you get if
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM, mszlazak wrote:
>
> If you don't like vxml then here is a post on voicePHP
>
>
> http://www.speechtechblog.com/2009/04/22/voicexml-to-go-down-in-the-third-says-voicephp
>
> It's from a vendor but there might be some good ideas to get from what they
> are doing.
>
If you don't like vxml then here is a post on voicePHP
http://www.speechtechblog.com/2009/04/22/voicexml-to-go-down-in-the-third-says-voicephp
It's from a vendor but there might be some good ideas to get from what they
are doing.
FreeSWITCH needs demand to get vxml and it's not there yet. For n
sn't good enough. Nice package.
-Original Message-
From: Arsen Chaloyan
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 3:15 am
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
VXML is not only interesting but required concept.
I'm not ta
"
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
To:
Message-ID:
<11372c8b9e603f4facde6ab18256dec60170f...@srvmtel.office.mtel.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I agree that the original commercial model used for VXML gets in the way
of it's own success. It
jk bericht-
Van: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] Namens Michael
Jerris
Verzonden: woensdag 22 april 2009 7:12
Aan: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
You can use VXML without ASR, but A
nessale
Verzonden: woensdag 22 april 2009 3:58
Aan: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
I was initially turned off by VXML when it came out because the first
way they tried to make money off it was to
sell the clients that let you build the actual xml. I w
You can use VXML without ASR, but ASR and TTS are both required parts
of the specs.
Mike
On Apr 21, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Brian West wrote:
> Isn't ASR optional in VXML?
>
> /b
>
> On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:15 PM, David Knell wrote:
>
>> Out of interest, is that using some RAD tool or coding directly
Isn't ASR optional in VXML?
/b
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:15 PM, David Knell wrote:
Out of interest, is that using some RAD tool or coding directly in
VoiceXML? I ask because VoiceXML strikes me as being a bastard
abomination of the highest order, whose sole saving grace is that
it's a standardise
Directly in vxml.
-Original Message-
From: David Knell
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 4:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 14:35 -0400, mszla...@aol.com wrote:
> Great Idea.
> Try setting
I was initially turned off by VXML when it came out because the first way
they tried to make money off it was to
sell the clients that let you build the actual xml. I was not really
motivated to pay money to be able to
just generate xml just so i could code a free server for it so I lost
interest.
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 14:35 -0400, mszla...@aol.com wrote:
> Great Idea.
> Try setting up the exact same dialogue with say Voxeo's VoiceXML
> system and then with Javascript/Lua and pocketsphinx. It's an order of
> magnitude faster with VoiceXML.
Out of interest, is that using some RAD tool or co
FreeSWITCH has a generic ASR interface to plug into any asr engine.
The quality of the integrated free asr has little to do with VXML. If
you want more robust asr, you will likely need to pay for it.
Mike
On Apr 21, 2009, at 2:35 PM, mszla...@aol.com wrote:
Great Idea.
Try setting up th
Message-
From: Remko Kloosterman
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Sent: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:57 am
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML
Hi
everyone,
?
Did someone ever try
and implement a VXML interface on freeswitch? Or do you think it's a good idea?
Or not?
To the best of my knowledge no one has created an interface for this. I'm
sure one will be created if and when the market demand gets high enough.
-MC
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Remko Kloosterman
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Did someone ever try and implement a VXML interface on freeswitch?
Hi everyone,
Did someone ever try and implement a VXML interface on freeswitch? Or do
you think it's a good idea? Or not? Since it is an actual standard, I
guess there might be a market for application service providers.
Remko
___
Freeswitch-users mai
We actually do have a commercial Voice Biometric component for FreeSwitch.
You can contact me offline if you are interested.
-E
http://Gpro.ws
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/list
On Sep 24, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Ryan, Jay wrote:
Hi,
I am new to freeswitch. I have a few questions:
1. Is there a way to get a VoiceXML browser (e.g. i6net) glued into
freeswitch?
It would require some coding, but the major pieces and interfaces are
there to do so.
2. How about a more
Hi,
I am new to freeswitch. I have a few questions:
1. Is there a way to get a VoiceXML browser (e.g. i6net) glued into
freeswitch?
2. How about a more challenging integration of speaker identification
(not ASR...an sdk that says...oh I know who this speaker is).
3. Are the integrated
Here are the new standards.. heavily backed by IBM and Nuance
VXML2 and SSML/SCXML,
Xhtml + Voice Profile, (also known as Xhtml+Voice1.) or X+V
And yes, you can do it all in JS, if you preferred
-E
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@li
8:13 PM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] VoiceXML?
And the same for CCXML - anyone working on integrating it with
Freeswitch, how hard might it be?
Larry Edelstein
Principal Software Engineer
LiveVox
http://www.livevox.com
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:
And the same for CCXML - anyone working on integrating it with Freeswitch,
how hard might it be?
Larry Edelstein
Principal Software Engineer
LiveVox
http://www.livevox.com
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Larry Edelstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all -
>
> Is anyone working on connecting
Hey all -
Is anyone working on connecting a VoiceXML interpreter to Freeswitch? I've
seen a mention or two of a mod_vxml, but that's about all.
How hard would it be to write a module that bridged the two?
Larry Edelstein
Principal Software Engineer
LiveVox
http://www.livevox.com
35 matches
Mail list logo
