I lol'd. This thread provided much amusement after a long week.
=]
Sorry for not being more constructive myself but can someone drill the
devs for specific reasons (architectural etc) xml is the best solution
and wikify the results? If I get a chance I plan on doing exactly that
if I have some
>
> Have you checked out http://wiki.freeswitch.org ?
>
I did, & I m not criticizing, I m just pointing out that there is a huge
emptiness in the Internet when you type freeswitch in any search engine,
this means we the ones who are using FS need to stop writing FS & write the
complete FreeSWITCH
Have you checked out http://wiki.freeswitch.org ?
Mike
On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Arthur wrote:
I personaly don't see the use of XML as a problem, but I see a lack
of documentation about the whole FS project as a problem, because
when someone doesn't understand how to manage a FS server
I personaly don't see the use of XML as a problem, but I see a lack of
documentation about the whole FS project as a problem, because when someone
doesn't understand how to manage a FS server he starts blaming to the ugly
looking XML files when opened with vi. I went to video.google.com ... there
w
We should put this effort into collaborating on one of the hundred areas I
am open and flexible towards!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:33 AM, EdPimentl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here
> http://yaml.kwiki.org/index.cgi?XmlYaml
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=21461
>
Here
http://yaml.kwiki.org/index.cgi?XmlYaml
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=21461
E
http://koopons.mobi
http://mobiquity.ws
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.or
I like the idea. Translate YAML to XML. Personally I look at YAML
and it just doesn't make sense to me. Looks like you can make plenty
of mistakes.
On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Klaus Teller wrote:
> I would think that it would be sufficient to provide parsers (or
> transformers) that al
people would
absolutely need these alternate notations?
Klaus L'Imbecile.
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:47:46 -0400
> Von: EdPimentl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] YAML suppo
The debate of YAML vs XML and XML vs JSON is not new...
Can YAML really replace XML?
To be frank, whatever can be done in XML can be done without XML.
Do you need XML for XML-RPC? Yes,
Is it necessary to use XML for RPC? No.
Is it necessary to use XML for RDF? No.
Is it necessary to use XML for,
Thank you for the suggestion.
I am open to many suggestions about FreeSWITCH but the minimal way we use
XML cannot be undone.
I am not sure you actually tried FreeSWITCH very much if you think the XML
is difficult to work with.
Almost every config file that uses xml is still just name value pairs
Diego,
I can already tell you Its not going to happen. The choice was made
early on and it was the correct one. It's not something that can be
changed or modular. If XML is the single reason you won't be using
FreeSWITCH then by all means stick with Asterisk, because we aren't
go
I am afraid that the xml is not a modular part of the system, it is
quite integral to the freeswitch configuration engine. Perhaps you
could look at programatically generating the xml or freeswitch may not
be the best project for you.
Mike
On Jun 26, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Diego Viola wrote:
Hi everyone -
I really love this project... I love the design you guys took with FS,
I love the stability, the features, the openness of it, it's the VoIP
platform I always dreamed of it... FreeSWITCH is what Asterisk should
have been.
But I just don't like one thing: XML.
I also don't intend to
13 matches
Mail list logo
