you specify in your event.
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Hi Guys,
Is there an alternative to the hang-up event that doesn't send quite as
much data? This event is HUGE!
All I'm looking for this the result of the call, duration
Hi Jay,
Have to say my DTMF works flawlessly on thousands of calls. (SVN trunk
from a couple of days ago. We handle around 100,000 calls/day via FS)
That said, I've found it depends on your SIP trunk provider.That
doesn't mean to say there isn't a problem; it's just that I haven't
Hi Guys,
Been running 'make current' and appropriate intervals over the last few
months and all's been well until today
Now I get the following, obviously mod_sndfile isn't happy, but I'm not
sure what to do to fix it
Regards,
making all mod_sndfile
cd . /bin/sh
@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Make current fails
Reboot strap.
/b
On Jun 1, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Nik Middleton wrote:
Hi Guys,
Been running 'make current' and appropriate intervals over the last few
months and all's been well until today
Now I get
From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Nik
Middleton
Sent: 01 June 2009 21:52
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Make current fails
Thanks
Well I can only assume build 13537 is brain dead. Surely I shouldn't
have to edit a whole bunch of configs to get it working. FS now takes 3
minutes to start, with no indication as to what it's looking for in the
logs. That said, to date 'make current' has always worked well for me.
Guess I was
As I understand it, a new 'feature' was added over the weekend to
resolve NAT. If you're firewall is not allowing ICMP then FS waits
until it times out. At this time there is no option to disable it.
Regards
From:
Hi Guys,
I'm going some work with outbound socket, and have a few questions.
When each call is answered, I get a connection to my server socket.
Is it right to assume that this connection will remain for the duration
of the call?
If so, do I still need to pass the UUID when I call
I've put some c++ test code together to let the outbound socket control
the call, all works as expected, apart from the event subscription
Sending myevents\n\ngives the channel events
However sending event text all\n\n doesn't give me any events apart from
the channel events.
I finally got around to looking at why mod vmd didn't appear to run when
using LUA. Turned out that the example in the wiki was wrong.
It should have been session:execute(vmd,start);
And not session:execute(vmd);
I've updated the wiki
Regards,
Hi Guys,
Ran make current today, and am getting the following errors. I ran
bootstrap and configure, but still get these messages.
Any ideas ? Looks like I'm now missing some libraries
Regards,
configure: configuring in libs/pcre
configure: running /bin/sh './configure.gnu'
: [Freeswitch-users] Problems with make current
your svn update failed,
rm -rf libs/pcre svn update ./bootstrap.sh ./configure make
current
On Jun 10, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Nik Middleton wrote:
Hi Guys,
Ran make current today, and am getting the following errors. I ran
bootstrap
Ok, so I did a mere 86,000 calls today, but when it was all over, I had
6 sessions remaining like the one below (number and ISP changed)
Anyone have an idea why these 6 sessions remain? I also had 120 calls
that I didn't get a hang-up for, but that might be me not processing the
events
From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Collins
Sent: 11 June 2009 22:20
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Orphaned calls
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Nik
Not sure where enhancement requests should be posted, but here it is
anyway
I would dearly love to be able to send a status event that returns an
event style output that provides machine readable output rather than the
wordy human readable response. (I hate parsing)
Is there such an
] Orphaned calls
If they were still showing in status, can you use gcore to dump a core
next time this happens, leave it running somewhere we can get to it and
post a thread apply all bt to Jira.
Mike
On Jun 11, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote
I couldn't agree more. We're working with a group that are developing a
massive PHP based music application. They are experts in PHP and MySQL but not
in VOIP/Telephony. By tuning an abstraction layer that uses PHP to communicate
with the FS event socket, allows them to work on the areas
Anything that's dedicated undoubtedly has less load that something
that's multifunctioned. However the lack of any conversations on front
ending a SIP server to FS would likely indicate that no one's found a
requirement for it at this time.
I would truly hate to see discussions of theoretical
Hi Guys,
This one has me a little baffled. If have a recent build (in the last
week) of FS installed on two near identical HP servers. One happily
runs 400 concurrent calls at around 50% CPU. The other can only run
around 50 calls without the CPU going to 98%. Identical configs and lua
at 3:54 PM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Hi Guys,
This one has me a little baffled. If have a recent build (in the last
week) of FS installed on two near identical HP servers. One happily
runs 400 concurrent calls at around 50% CPU. The other can only run
around 50
You are indeed correct, it's the 64bit server that performs well, not
the 32bit PAE version. I'm hoping that's the cause. I need to dig
around and find out if it's possible to change the kernel remotely and
see it sorts the issue. Ultimately I'll update it to 64 bit anyway, but
that's a 500
Hi Guys,
Scratching my head on this one, under load FS is not playing an audio
file, OR and lua script is not getting executed. Not all the time, just
some. I've changed ulimit -n to 9 but no diff, and ideas where else
I might look?
Regards,
-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Nik
Middleton
Sent: 23 June 2009 17:46
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Sound file or lua script not played under
load
Hi Guys,
Scratching my head on this one, under load FS is not playing an audio
file
to a local_stream is not reading
from that stream source, such as if you paused during playback of a
local_stream.
They are only a real issue if you are getting them with no calls up.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Hmm,
Looking at console I'm
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to parse events in C++ for an outbound socket. The docs are
a little contradictory, so I wonder if someone could help me out.
As I understand it and event is terminated with double LF's (\n\n)
However if there is a Content-Length header the wiki very confusingly
says
But from where? After the double LF of the header as one part of the wiki says
or after the line containing the content-length that another part of the wiki
says?
-Original Message-
From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org
OK, finally figured it out.
Have updated the Wiki to remove ambiguity and posted some SUDO code
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Nik
Middleton
Sent: 28 June 2009 20:38
...@lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of
Brian West
Sent: 29 June 2009 00:00
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Myevents in outbound socket
Are you using ESL?
/b
On Jun 28, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Nik
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to bridge to another destination while controlling a call
via the outbound socket?
In other words, I'm controlling a call using an outbound socket and at
some point want to originate a new call leg and bridge the two.
If it can't be done that way, I'm thinking I
] On Behalf Of
Michael Collins
Sent: 29 June 2009 21:22
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] bridge call from outbound socket
would you mind doing a pb of your script that is handling the OB event
socket connection?
-MC
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Nik
I'm ONLY use PCMA, so I would agree with Brian
-Original Message-
From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of
Brian West
Sent: 01 July 2009 20:35
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to set a channel variable while a call is in progress
using an outbound event socket? I have a listening process that
examines the hang-up events and it would be neat if it could also get
some variables that I have set mid call as well. Note: I know it's
possible to
@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting channel variables using event
socket
uuid_setvar
/b
On Jul 11, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Nik Middleton wrote:
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to set a channel variable while a call is in progress
using an outbound event socket? I have
On Jul 11, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Nik Middleton wrote: Excellent.
Do I need to supply uuid on an out...
___
Freeswitch-users mailing list
Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setting channel variables using event
socket
If you're going to do it that way you can just use set.
uuid_setvar is an api call...
/b
On Jul 12, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Nik Middleton wrote:
HI Guys,
Can't seem to get this to work
call-command
If this is Linux, there's nothing wrong with it using most of the
memory, if it starts to use the swap, then there might be an issue.
Utilizing the memory does not mean there is a memory leak
Regards,
From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org
I'd heard rumours that this was going to happen and it's great news and
good news for FS as well. With a user friendly front end, FS is sure to
fly. I have no doubt that this will be the first of many.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org
Hi Guys,
I'm getting a core dump when running an lua script that's been fine for
months
In Freeswitch_lua.cpp line 92 is being called, but it's not clear what
exactly this is doing
lua_State *Session::getLUA()
{
if (!L) {
with an older mod_lua with a
newer FreeSWITCH
did you update via make current?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm getting a core dump when running an lua script that's been fine for
months
In Freeswitch_lua.cpp line 92 is being
Check out this range
http://www.noblesolutions.co.uk/shop/index.php?main_page=indexmanufactu
rers_id=16
You should be able to find a local supplier
We've used them for a couple of years now. They just plug into your
network.
Regards,
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Guys,
This one has me stumped.
I'm originating a call, playing audio, trapping on DTMF and bridging to
another endpoint (read phone number)
If the A leg hangs up, then the call is cleared down and all is well.
However if the B Leg attempts to hang-up, the LUA script that is
handling the
Hi,
Is there an option to hang-up both call legs in a bridge when one leg
hangs up?
In my lua script I only ever see the hang-up for the call I'm in, not
for the bridged b leg. That said, I can see both a hang-up and un
bridge event being fired for the B leg. However my issue is that the
to the other thread?
set the channel variable hangup_after_bridge=true on the a leg
your script must not be checking for the case when b leg hangs up that A
leg does not hangup unless that var is set.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Hi
Hi, Is it possible to disable being able to put a call on hold using
hook flash?
Regards
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
-users] how to disable hook flash hold
It can be done from the phone itself; for example on a Grandstream
phone it is done with the option Onhook Threshold: setting it to
hookflash OFF
2009/12/5 Nik Middleton nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk
Hi, Is it possible to disable being able to put a call
to something... (ZAP channel or an ATA or a
gateway). It is there you configure this behaviour.
T.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Sorry, I meant from a POTS phone
Regards
-Original Message-
From: freeswitch-users-boun
Hi all,
I'll slowly pulling my hair out on this one. I had FS successfully
hanging up both legs on a bridge, now today, with nothing changed, I'm
not seeing a hangup of the b leg at all.
FS is behind a PIX, so it might be a weird NAT issue, but A leg calls
hangup just fine. Before when I
7, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Hi all,
I'll slowly pulling my hair out on this one. I had FS successfully
hanging up both legs on a bridge, now today, with nothing changed, I'm
not seeing a hangup of the b leg at all.
FS is behind a PIX, so
Hi
Is it possible to trap on DTMF on a bridged call within an LUA script?
I've tried setting the gateway to use inband, but no joy. It looks like
I could use start_dtmf, but I can't see how to launch this within LUA
Regards,
___
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trapping dtmf on bridged call
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to trap on DTMF on a bridged call within an LUA script?
I've tried setting the gateway to use inband, but no joy. It looks
at 4:02 PM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to trap on DTMF on a bridged call within an LUA script?
I've tried setting the gateway to use inband, but no joy. It looks like
I could use start_dtmf, but I can't see how to launch this within LUA
Regards
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Trapping dtmf on bridged call
did you set the inputcallback too?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Nik Middleton
nik.middle...@noblesolutions.co.uk wrote:
Can this be done in an lua script?
Regards,
From: freeswitch-users
Thought I'd send this little hurrah! As there seems to have been a lot
of negativity on this list lately.
From my point of view, having looked at many solutions out there, FS is
still number one with regards to flexibility and performance. I cannot
imagine doing what I'm using FS for, with
logs and sip traces to be able to figure out
what exactly is going on here.
Mike
On Dec 7, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Nik Middleton wrote:
Sorry no, apart from the fact that I was seeing the hangup.
I'm wondering if this a bandwidth congestion issue. Is there anyway on
a bridged call I
condition when the call is in process
of tearing down.
Mike
On Dec 8, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Nik Middleton wrote:
No doubt, but that's a little difficult as this only happens
occasionally and I have 200 calls going on at the time. It's needle in
the haystack stuff.
Here's what I know
] On Behalf Of
Fred-145
Sent: 09 December 2009 19:55
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] FS Rocks!
Nik Middleton wrote:
I cannot imagine doing what I'm using FS for, with any other product.
Yes
it's frustrating at times, but this is largely down
101 - 156 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
