Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-20 Thread Metik
a fixed location and if it does, you want to simply challenge it as usual to prevent toll fraud? I have found that its best to mitigate an attack at ingress before it even makes it to critical infrastructure (media gateways, application/media servers, etc.). -metik Bill W. wrote: Hey Metik

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-19 Thread Metik
a relevant example). -metik Bill W. wrote: Hey Metik, Thanks so much for your insights and your help. And yes, I was able to append the X-AUTH-IP header with no problem. But that didn't solve the issue. After some more research, it appears that the problem isn't with auth-calls at all. I

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-19 Thread Metik
I noticed a typo in my post that may easily confuse someone... user id=7105551212 cidr=127.0.0.0/8// should be: user id=7105551212 cidr=127.0.0.0/8 -metik Metik wrote: Bill, I think you would add this to the user profile in the directory. The brian.xml example (located in ${confdir

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-18 Thread Metik
to its speed and flexibility since it is not a B2BUA). Based on Mathieu's response (and he is definitely someone that would know), it looks like you should be able to easily append a X-AUTH-IP header (via OpenSIPS) containing the IP address of the endpoint and call it a day. -metik Bill W wrote

Re: [Freeswitch-users] LUA and return variables

2009-12-18 Thread Metik
I use a similar method (transfer to XML dialplan based on the value of ${enum_route_1}) to determine if the SIP URI is native to a particular FS instance or if it needs to be sent off-net and it works well. -metik Michael Collins wrote: On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Robin Vleij vi...@fx

Re: [Freeswitch-users] sip message logging and analysis

2009-12-17 Thread Metik
to your FS box, you may want to use tcpdump or ngrep along with screen. tshark (tty/cli vesion of Wireshark) and sipgrep are also extremely useful. The later requires ngrep and a couple perl modules but I believe it is included with FS in the contrib or scripts directory--I forget which). -metik

Re: [Freeswitch-users] ACLs through proxy

2009-12-17 Thread Metik
boxes to create an ad-hoc cluster. I actually have session border controllers that have this feature and use it quite often. -metik Bill W wrote: Hey Metik, Thanks for the reply, and the pointers for doing it with xml_curl. I'll guess have to do that in the short term, but in my opinion

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Translating DTMF from RFC2833 to INFO

2009-12-06 Thread Metik
that the value of Negotiated Dtmf-relay is rtp-nte. -metik Yehavi Bourvine wrote: Hello Ognjen, From the tests I've done it is not so... When I set the profile to use INFO, and a phone calls and asks for RFC2833 (phone-events in the SDP) the FreeSwich ignores it (does not have phone

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Translating DTMF from RFC2833 to INFO

2009-12-06 Thread Metik
some issues when multple dtmf relay types are left enabled on a voip dial peer. Also, there are some (older) IOS versions that have issues with DTMF duration which cause digits to be misinterpreted by the far-end (PSTN/POTS) but not ignored altogether. -metik Yehavi Bourvine wrote: Hello

Re: [Freeswitch-users] HA questions.

2009-12-04 Thread Metik
significant investments in time and resources to implement it in the sofia sip stack at the moment. -metik Tim Uckun wrote: I have read some of the archived emails about HA, loadbalancing, failover etc and I am still a bit confused about how I could set up some sort of resiliency with freeswitch. My

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Cisco IOS gateway: command to send connected line name

2009-12-03 Thread Metik
outgoing display-ie (config-if)#isdn outgoing ie caller-number (config-if)#isdn outgoing ie called-number -metik Yehavi Bourvine wrote: Hello, We have a Cisco running IOS 12.4T used as our SIP-PRI gateway. On the PRI there is a Nortel with Q.Sig. After a lot of configuration trials I've

Re: [Freeswitch-users] TFTP Server Cisco 7540

2009-11-20 Thread Metik
it in the past and it does support it. It is not by any means feature rich but should suffice given his needs. The other alternative is to install Cygwin-based build of the ISC DHCP server. -metik Karl J. Vesterling wrote: You'd think so wouldn't you... Even the DHCP Server with Snow Leopard

Re: [Freeswitch-users] TFTP Server Cisco 7540

2009-11-19 Thread Metik
of gear (dslams, routers, softswitches, SIP endpoints, etc.) when a dedicated server was not available. -metik Jeff Lenk wrote: Hi I run the SolarWinds TFTP server alongside FS on my small installation - works nicely! Jeff Dave Stevenson wrote: Hi, I have just about got FreeSwitch

Re: [Freeswitch-users] TFTP Server Cisco 7540

2009-11-19 Thread Metik
He should be able to just use Additional Option to add option 150 (and the associated IP address to which the TFTP server is bound). Brian West wrote: Some Cisco phones need DHCP option 150. /b On Nov 19, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Dave Stevenson wrote: Metik, thanks a lot for the tip, I

[Freeswitch-users] Using uuid_transfer with uuid_hold

2009-11-17 Thread Metik
Using the API, any caveats with transferring a call (via uuid_transfer) that has been placed on hold (via uuid_hold) without using uuild_hold off before doing so? Is it even possible? -metik ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Using uuid_transfer with uuid_hold

2009-11-17 Thread Metik
Brian, That explains what I have been seeing... The console would freeze or the xml-rpc request would never receive a response (trunk rev 15463). -metik Brian West wrote: uuid_hold will send a HOLD indication to the end you're talking to ... it will NOT put the person your talking

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setup advice on small LAN

2009-10-26 Thread Metik
free to email my off list and I can help you. The cost difference should be minimal unless you move to second line (a/k/a naked, unbundled, or dedicated) DSL. -metik - Original Message - From: Lars Zeb To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 1:37

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Setup advice on small LAN

2009-10-26 Thread Metik
and adequate CPU (since the majority of them use software based queuing and packet fragmentation). The only caveat is that the degree of success can vary between firmware versions. Some of the consumer (gaming) or small business (VPN) grade routers work well (Linksys, DLINK, etc.). -metik

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Hostname

2009-10-23 Thread Metik
Why not simply overwrite the value of the variable used throughout the script... -- xml_curl.conf -- ... param name=gateway-url value=http://localhost/index.php?xhostname=myhost; bindings=dialplan/ ... -- index.php -- ? $_REQUEST['hostname'] = $xhostname; ... - Original Message

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Hostname

2009-10-23 Thread Metik
Please note that this would essentially be taking Chris' suggestion a little further but the effort involved would be minimal. - Original Message - From: Metik To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Hostname

2009-10-23 Thread Metik
already thought of this and its a case of RTFM. -metik - Original Message - From: Metik To: Metik ; freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Hostname Please note that this would essentially be taking Chris

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Overlap support?

2009-10-13 Thread Metik
Both support it. In the Grandstream, I believe it is called Early Dial (vs. SNOM's Overlap Dialing). It can be problematic if you have a device somewhere in the middle that doesn't support 484s. -metik - Original Message - From: Anthony Minessale To: freeswitch-users

Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIP Overlap support?

2009-10-13 Thread Metik
sort of interop issue with the carrier involved that is wrecking havoc with your particular application? -metik - Original Message - From: Tihomir Culjaga To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:24 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] SIP

[Freeswitch-users] User Directory and Per-user (Channel) variables

2009-05-18 Thread Metik
bridge() appears to be ignoring the absolute_codec_string channel variable defined in the User Directory even though info shows that it is present. Other variables, such as effective_caller_id_number seem to behave correctly which leads me to believe that this may be a very minor bug. In order

Re: [Freeswitch-users] User Directory and Per-user (Channel)variables

2009-05-18 Thread Metik
Oddly enough, I initially though that was the problem and enabled it without any success... freeswi...@noesis.metik.com sofia status profile internal API CALL [sofia(status profile internal)] output:

Re: [Freeswitch-users] User Directory and Per-user(Channel)variables

2009-05-18 Thread Metik
Math, That was it--thank you very much! -Metik - Original Message - From: Mathieu Rene To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:25 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] User Directory and Per-user(Channel)variables absolute_codec_string needs