... it's not easy to understand British humor ...
Am 19.12.2020 um 21:01 schrieb Stephen Pettitt via Freetel-codec2:
You have just given the exact reason why the UK should have stayed in the EU…
oops, a bit off topic.
On 19 Dec 2020, at 10:11, Helmut Oeller wrote:
Who takes care of US law
Thank you Albert - I like the idea of only addressing list behavior
against the code of conduct to people off list, in private emails. We'd
probably need to nominate a couple of people to keep an eye on list
behavior (including mine) and write those emails.
- David
On 20/12/20 11:28 am,
> A code of conduct for Codec2/FreeDV and this mailing list is a good
> idea. The participant policies document is a good start, but has a
> strong focus on gender issues and face-face behiavour. We could
> probably get away with something shorter and more concise.
The typical code of conduct,
You have just given the exact reason why the UK should have stayed in the EU…
oops, a bit off topic.
> On 19 Dec 2020, at 10:11, Helmut Oeller wrote:
>
>
> Who takes care of US law outside that country? Science and development can’t
> be regulated by US ‚policemen‘. US authorities should
Who takes care of US law outside that country? Science and development
can’t be regulated by US ‚policemen‘. US authorities should spend more
time to tame the big predators goggle, facebook etc.
We need no US paternalim!
DC6NY
Am 18.12.2020 um 23:13 schrieb David Rowe:
Thanks Bruce,
I
Thanks Bruce,
I would imagine keeping on the right side of the Defence and Strategic
Goods List and Ham Radio regulations (or the local equivalent in any
given country) would avoid any issues, and certainly the more dramatic
scenarios you have alluded to. I'll ask a few questions with my
Besides ITAR/EAR, looking at the treason laws in the USA, there is jail
time for rendering aid to foreign military, and instructing in military
activities requires your organization to be registered with the Attorney
General (for careful watching).
I wrote participant policies for ORI about 2
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:45 AM Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> While not prohibiting military use of codec2 (because that's not the
> open source way), there should be a prohibition against asking for
> help with military use (because a lot of such help is unlawful for
> many).
>
I wrote a
