Re: [Freetel-codec2] cascaded ulaw, Alaw and,AMBE etc

2016-09-17 Thread Stuart Longland
On 17/09/16 18:28, glen english wrote: > Yeah. > > Cascading codecs is always trouble. > > BTW My understand of the word TRANSCODING is going between one encoded > method and another without going back all the way to uncompressed. Going > between different video encoding methods usually done

Re: [Freetel-codec2] cascaded ulaw, Alaw and,AMBE etc

2016-09-16 Thread David Rowe
It's a good question Glen, off the top of my head I'm not sure. When one or more codecs are combined it's called transcoding and IIRC often causes problems. Alaw/mulaw are rather non-linear operations. That could upset the parameter estimation algorithms. - David On 17/09/16 11:38, glen

[Freetel-codec2] cascaded ulaw, Alaw and,AMBE etc

2016-09-16 Thread glen english
David you are the man to ask this one Why do (or why do you think) relatively benign companding algorithms like Alaw, uLaw, that are commonly used for encoding for VOIP links for radio systems (and other) , sounds so awful when they pass AMBE/ AMBE2 etc processed speech ? Must be something