Is Width and height of the glyph is correct if i do the following??Is it the
right way of getting the exact width and height? or is there any other way
or API in freetype to get these values?
How does it work for a Space char in a string?? can we move it by advance X
width??? Does it okay to do
Is Width and height of the glyph is correct if i do the following??
No. You can't get the exact width and height of a glyph at a specific
DPI using the bounding box (to be more precise, if the DPI is smaller
than the font's `units per em' value, used by the font designer to
create the glyph).
So,You mean irrespective of what ever we do...the BBox is Always
negative.
For this glyph, yes.
In your previous reply you said, the only way to get the exact
metrics is to render _all_ glyphs.
Sorry for being ambiguous. It either means:
. To get the smallest global bounding box of a
I've found that this small hack/patch does amazing things toward a
CT-like rendering, when TT interpreter is enabled at compile time:
--- ttinterp.c.orig 2010-02-23 18:48:43.0 -0600
+++ ttinterp.c 2010-02-23 18:49:16.0 -0600
@@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@
{
FT_UNUSED_EXEC;
Stumbled upon freetype.com by accident. Have people seen this before?
Interesting...
behdad
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Despicable domain squatting and negative advertising. Shame on them.
Graham
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Stumbled upon freetype.com by accident. Have people seen this before?
Interesting...
behdad
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Hi,
In Fedora rawhide I enabled the patented bytecode interpretter a while ago
since the patents expired. I've received reports since that this has resulted
in degraded rendering of some fonts.
Apparently, from what I hear, with Medium hinting, the autohinter is not used
even if the font
In Fedora rawhide I enabled the patented bytecode interpretter a
while ago since the patents expired. I've received reports since
that this has resulted in degraded rendering of some fonts.
Apparently, from what I hear, with Medium hinting, the autohinter is
not used even if the font
Stumbled upon freetype.com by accident. Have people seen this
before? Interesting...
Despicable domain squatting and negative advertising. Shame on them.
Indeed! I've seen this the first time, and it seems that FreeType is
a threat to them, especially since their `iType' product has the
Excuse me ,I don't understand why we need tell the
slashdot.org people?
Well, there is no `need'. Often, if a company gets bad press it is
willing to change the issue. This was my idea. I can't tell you
whether this is the right solution (probably not). I simply don't
know
Excuse me ,I don't understand why we need tell the
slashdot.org people?
Another reason for my first reaction (this is, to contact slashdot) is
the impudence of this negative advertisement. Up to now I've never
seen such a thing, and it is probably worth to be seen by many people.
11 matches
Mail list logo
