Re: [ft] Freetype 2.4.4 - freetype 2.4.12: FT_Get_Advance changed behaviour?

2013-06-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I've reduced my code to the attached program (which is still a bit convoluted - sorry!). [...] Thanks. There was a serious bug in FT_Get_Advance which has been fixed in version 2.4.9: According to the documentation, the returned advance value is either in 16.16 format or in font units.

Re: [ft] Freetype 2.4.4 - freetype 2.4.12: FT_Get_Advance changed behaviour?

2013-06-03 Thread Gregor Mückl
On 6/3/2013 9:05 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: I've reduced my code to the attached program (which is still a bit convoluted - sorry!). [...] Thanks. There was a serious bug in FT_Get_Advance which has been fixed in version 2.4.9: According to the documentation, the returned advance value is

[ft] Freetype 2.4.4 - freetype 2.4.12: FT_Get_Advance changed behaviour?

2013-06-02 Thread Gregor Mückl
Hi! I've upgraded a project of mine from using freetype 2.4.4 to freetype 2.4.12 and now I experience totally broken text layouting (the layouting code is my own). Horizontal spacings between characters are now either far too large or far too small, depending on the font. In one case the

Re: [ft] Freetype 2.4.4 - freetype 2.4.12: FT_Get_Advance changed behaviour?

2013-06-02 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I've upgraded a project of mine from using freetype 2.4.4 to freetype 2.4.12 and now I experience totally broken text layouting (the layouting code is my own). Horizontal spacings between characters are now either far too large or far too small, depending on the font. In one case the glyph