Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-26 Thread Ismail Donmez
26 Kas 2006 Paz 00:19 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız: Uhm I just looked again in kfontview with latest CVS and bold N character still have the same problem. What about ftview? Same in ftview, attached is the screenshot of ftview -m MENNO ppem ~/buggy-font/verdanab.ttf Regards, ismail

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Same in ftview, attached is the screenshot of ftview -m MENNO ppem ~/buggy-font/verdanab.ttf Hmrpf. The picture you've sent to the list shows the the *anti-aliased* version. Just press the `a' key to get the correct rendering result. I can only repeat that this font cannot be rendered

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-26 Thread Ismail Donmez
27 Kas 2006 Pts 00:23 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız: Same in ftview, attached is the screenshot of ftview -m MENNO ppem ~/buggy-font/verdanab.ttf Hmrpf. The picture you've sent to the list shows the the *anti-aliased* version. Just press the `a' key to get the correct rendering result.

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-25 Thread Ismail Donmez
25 Kas 2006 Cts 02:10 tarihinde, Werner LEMBERG şunları yazmıştı: Is the bug supposed to be fixed now? Yes, it is fixed -- I just tried again. Becase I can still reproduce with latest CVS. What exactly can you reproduce? Note that grayscale rendering in the range 9-16 ppem is

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Uhm I just looked again in kfontview with latest CVS and bold N character still have the same problem. What about ftview? Werner ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-24 Thread Ismail Donmez
22 Kas 2006 Çar 12:36 tarihinde, Werner LEMBERG şunları yazmıştı: Currently, I can't debug the fpgm/prep tables with FontForge because it crashes. Rogier, maybe this information gives you further hints. It seems that we have wrong assumptions on the storage area, and how RS/WS interact

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Is the bug supposed to be fixed now? Yes, it is fixed -- I just tried again. Becase I can still reproduce with latest CVS. What exactly can you reproduce? Note that grayscale rendering in the range 9-16 ppem is *unusable* with this font! You have to follow the recommendations from the

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Currently, I can't debug the fpgm/prep tables with FontForge because it crashes. Rogier, maybe this information gives you further hints. It seems that we have wrong assumptions on the storage area, and how RS/WS interact with the CVT. George provided a quick patch, so I was able to debug

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-18 Thread Rogier van Dalen
On 11/14/06, Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached is a screenshot of kfontviewer showing Verdana Bold at some sizes. Notice that 2nd and 3rd entries show that N character is badly displayed. Confirmed. David's latest changes to the bytecode interpreter (to make it

IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Attached is a screenshot of kfontviewer showing Verdana Bold at some sizes. Notice that 2nd and 3rd entries show that N character is badly displayed. Confirmed. David's latest changes to the bytecode interpreter (to make it work the same as the Windows rasterizer) are still buggy.

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I don't have much time at the moment, though I just finished a large commit spree recently. Even though I'd like to investigate this problem in parallel with the enhancement bugs we have in the interpreter, I really feel we should prepare for a new release before that. OK. PS: By the way,

Re: IMPORTANT! Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-14 Thread David Turner
I don't have much time at the moment, though I just finished a large commit spree recently. Even though I'd like to investigate this problem in parallel with the enhancement bugs we have in the interpreter, I really feel we should prepare for a new release before that. More on this later, -

Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-14 Thread Ismail Donmez
12 Kas 2006 Paz 16:10 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız: For me it works (see attached image). Can you try to find out why ftview fails? Maybe a X.org problem I use X.org 7.1, are you using 7.0 or 7.1? I use 6.9.0. Problem seems to be DEVICE_X11 is not defined when make is used ( its

Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-13 Thread Gordon Messmer
Werner LEMBERG wrote: I can't get ftview to work: [~/CVS/ft2demos/bin] ./ftview pppem ~/buggy-font/verdanab.ttf could not allocate display surface error = 0x For me it works (see attached image). Can you try to find out why ftview fails? It probably was built on a system that didn't

Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
For me it works (see attached image). Can you try to find out why ftview fails? Maybe a X.org problem I use X.org 7.1, are you using 7.0 or 7.1? I use 6.9.0. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org

Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Attached is a screenshot of kfontviewer showing Verdana Bold at some sizes. Notice that 2nd and 3rd entries show that N character is badly displayed. Confirmed. David's latest changes to the bytecode interpreter (to make it work the same as the Windows rasterizer) are still buggy. AFAIK, he

Re: [ft] Problem with Verdana Bold

2006-11-11 Thread Ismail Donmez
11 Kas 2006 Cts 16:57 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız: Attached is a screenshot of kfontviewer showing Verdana Bold at some sizes. Notice that 2nd and 3rd entries show that N character is badly displayed. Confirmed. David's latest changes to the bytecode interpreter (to make it work the