Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h

2005-10-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I did find some discrepancies: ftsysmem.h doesn't put the function name on the the following line for ft_memory_new and ft_memory_destroy, This file, together with ftsysio.h, is obsolete; I've just removed both. cache/ftccmap.h uses a mixed format in FTC_CMapCache_New and

Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h

2005-10-27 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Werner LEMBERG wrote: I did find some discrepancies: ftsysmem.h doesn't put the function name on the the following line for ft_memory_new and ft_memory_destroy, This file, together with ftsysio.h, is obsolete; I've just removed both. cache/ftccmap.h uses a mixed

Re: [ft-devel] comp is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?

2005-10-27 Thread Werner LEMBERG
A haphazard Workaround for such issue (which replace comp by compo) is acceptable? In case this should be really necessary (see my other mail) I ask you to find a variable name which is `more natural', perhaps `Comp' or `component'. werner

RE: [ft-devel] comp is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?

2005-10-27 Thread George Williams
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:38, Steven Johnson wrote: I think that compiler also had extended as a reserved word (as a 96-bit floating point type, to match Motorola hardware of the time). I worked on an early version of the MPW compiler (when the work was outsourced from Apple). There was indeed an