Please confirm that ONE_PIXEL defined as 256 is not the unit of one pixel.
What is ONE_PIXEL then?
2010/10/13 GRAHAM ASHER graham.as...@btinternet.com:
Alexei,
I don't have much time or energy for this at the moment - sorry. Of course I
will be looking at it again, but I believe that the
Alexei,
I don't have much time or energy for this at the moment - sorry. Of course I
will be looking at it again, but I believe that the solution hammered out by
David Bevan and myself is a good one - it solves the bug I introduced while
retaining the speed increases I first made the changes
I guess my version has PIXEL_BITS = 6. Sorry, didn't notice the discrepancy.
Yes, FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATIO ought to be defined so that it's always 1/4 of a
pixel.
Graham
- Original Message
From: Алексей Подтележников apodt...@gmail.com
To: GRAHAM ASHER graham.as...@btinternet.com
Cc:
Alexei,
Similarly, I don't have the time necessary to validate and performance-test
your new algorithm.
Perhaps a good start would be for you to produce trace and performance results
comparing your algorithm against what Graham checked in (as I did, for example,
in my message of Tue, 7 Sep
I guess my version has PIXEL_BITS = 6. Sorry, didn't notice the
discrepancy. Yes, FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATIO ought to be defined so that
it's always 1/4 of a pixel.
Alexej, can you provide a patch to fix that?
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing
АП == Алексей Подтележников apodt...@gmail.com writes:
АП Frankly, I think I am starting to notice the quality down a bit.
I agree; the second png is worse that the first. But only just a bit.
You should try ONE_PIXEL/8 as you suggested.
Or, if even ONE_PIXEL/8 proves unpleasant, perhaps a
