Hi Werner,
Do you think it's possible that the autohinter can be tweaked to lessen the
effects of the aggressive vertical filtering of GDI?
or is it already at the limits of what's possible for GDI?
The feedback i'm getting from my screenshots is that the ttfautohint output is
overall superior
Hi all;
I am trying to audit our local patches to freetype2 in openSUSE to reduce
the number of patches we apply. I noticed that fix for CVE-2010-3311 [0] is
not applied to upstream freetype source. Attached is the fix for the issue
with the demo CFF file.
It would be nice to get this fixed so
I am trying to audit our local patches to freetype2 in openSUSE to
reduce the number of patches we apply. I noticed that fix for
CVE-2010-3311 [0] is not applied to upstream freetype source.
Attached is the fix for the issue with the demo CFF file.
It would be nice to get this fixed so we
Hi;
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I am trying to audit our local patches to freetype2 in openSUSE to
reduce the number of patches we apply. I noticed that fix for
CVE-2010-3311 [0] is not applied to upstream freetype source.
Attached is the fix for
Just posted screenshots of ttfautohint output under DirectWrite
(Cleartype Grayscaling).
Thanks again for your invaluable help in testing ttfautohint!
Interesting. imo, generally the ttfautohint output is superior to
the original fonts' output, though there are some glitches, e.g. dot
