Yes. So far there are 6 sets of changes, using the naming
conventions that you recommended. These patches were created off an
unmodified copy of the publicly available FreeType
2.4.8. Unfortunately I'm using SVN but the patches should still be
applicable (?)
Thanks for the patches! I've
One more minor set of changes, I moved an inline comment to the
previous line on a couple of #include lines.
What is this change set good for, except cosmetics?
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Excuse me, I got Forbidden error to the URL.
Could you add read permission to others?
Regards,
mpsuzuki
pravin@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using auto bold
algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see
2012/2/24 suzuki toshiya mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Excuse me, I got Forbidden error to the URL.
Could you add read permission to others?
corrected now.
Thanks,
Pravin Satpute
Regards,
mpsuzuki
pravin@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and
Thanks, hmm, I agree with your pointing out that
current auto bold synthesis does not work well for
Lohit Devanagari. The horizontal strokes are disconnected,
and the left half of the horizontal strokes are not flat.
I will check, although yet I'm not familiar with auto
bold synthesis code.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:05 AM, pravin@gmail.com
pravin@gmail.com wrote:
Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using auto bold
algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see
http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot.png
Can someone given me pointer that
Dear Alexei,
Thank you for notice, the latest FreeType2 shows the problem.
I will check if the previous stroker shows no problem.
Regards,
mpsuzuki
Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:05 AM, pravin@gmail.com
pravin@gmail.com wrote:
Lohit Devanagari does not have
