>>> With patch it is better now, see the attached image.
>>
>> You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly
>> joined! This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally
>> between each glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring. For complex
>> shaping, you need a demo program fr
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> With patch it is better now, see the attached image.
>
> You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly joined!
> This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally between each
> glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring.
On 12 March 2012 13:37, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly joined!
> > This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally between each
> > glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring.
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't support embolding... Patches
> You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly joined!
> This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally between each
> glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring.
Unfortunately, it doesn't support embolding... Patches welcomed :-)
Werner
___
> With patch it is better now, see the attached image.
You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly joined!
This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally between each
glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring. For complex shaping, you need
a demo program from, say, Pango.
