Alexei Podtelezhnikov-2 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:20 AM, jola hans-jochen@lhsystems.com
wrote:
Alexei Podtelezhnikov-2 wrote:
The only potential change in question is this:
The only potential change in question is this:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/?id=7baeeafcec7fd2267191937e14c1f753424beb89
Your guess was not wrong! This morning I repeated the tests, I had
conducted yesterday. I had been in a hurry and obviously mixed
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
The only potential change in question is this:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/?id=7baeeafcec7fd2267191937e14c1f753424beb89
Your guess was not wrong! This morning I repeated the tests, I had
[...] let's bring FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden in agreement with what
ftview does. This removes too much width that used to be added to
the emboldened glyphs.
Thanks. Do you have time to provide some documentation also?
Werner
___
Freetype-devel
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
[...] let's bring FT_GlyphSlot_Embolden in agreement with what
ftview does. This removes too much width that used to be added to
the emboldened glyphs.
Thanks. Do you have time to provide some documentation also?
Sure.
