>> Just let me know if you want me to proceed. I am not going to
>> spend the time on this if the consensus (sans me) is that we don't
>> need/want it.
Making new applications work with older versions of FreeType shared
libraries in case the new or changed functionality isn't needed sounds
usefu
Ah, I was reading the following and came across something that is an
argument against version scripts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
In particular: "Furthermore, using linker version scripts doesn't permit
GCC to better optimise the code."
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Tom Kacvinsky wr
Just let me know if you want me to proceed. I am not going to spend the
time on this if the consensus (sans me) is that we don't need/want it.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:22 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > I also hated the frontend of the symbol versions which requires GCC
> > assembler trickery.
> I also hated the frontend of the symbol versions which requires GCC
> assembler trickery.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SymbolVersioning
>
> This is a can of warms, which I do not want to open.
I guess we don't need this.
> I have started this when I saw that libtool wraps the flat file of
>
