> How is this:
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/freetype-commit/2020-07/msg00067.html
> ?
Nice! However, I think it's better to have two versions of
`SFD_ALLOC` and `SFD_FREE` depending on whether debugging is enabled
or not. There should be zero overhead for the non-debugging case.
Hi Anuj
> Which one do you think is better ? I prefer the second one i.e. adding
> another renderer within the `sdf' module. That way I can share some
> of the code, whereas creating another module will require me to
> rewrite everything.
Same module with two renderers as you described makes
>> * `FT_Lookup_Renderer' uses renderer format which is currently
>> `FT_GLYPH_FORMAT_OUTLINE' for the `sdf' module. How can
>>make it accept both outline and bitmap glyph format ?
>
> Regarding the second issue I think that you probably have to create a
> second renderer that shares most
Hello,
I have tried the query performance counter/frequency method for example
program:
(https://www.freetype.org/freetype2/docs/tutorial/example1.c)
on Windows with arial.ttf and FT2_DEBUG=any:7 on
string:"qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm"
which produced 24260 logs.
I have executed the test program
