Hi Hin-Tak,
Are there any stable distributions of the
prebuilt Skia binary, especially for Linux?
The skia-python package has its own Skia
binary (plus libbz2, libfreetype, libfontconfig,
libpng, and libuuid).
Once, I was involved in developing SVG Native
Viewer, which has the backend to Skia.
I think I am broadly in agreement with you.
FWIW, I don't think this difference in Adobe/Mozilla-origin OT-SVG font versus
Google-origin OT-SVG font is a bug in Google Fonts. That's why I never filed it
as such.
The difference as far as I guess, is as you described, though I'd put it in
If I'm following correctly
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/freetype/freetype-demos/-/commit/626b43db566f907fa7b6926705e914259c54b9cf
is working around a bug that results from rsvg taking an svg2
interpretation of width/height. That seems a bit odd as the opentype spec
specifically references
Okay it says "out-of-memory condition"
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/freetype/freetype-demos/-/commit/626b43db566f907fa7b6926705e914259c54b9cf
instead of "memory exhaustion" (I think that's my subject heading when I
posted to freetype-devel).
It has my name on it, and is the 3rd most recent
Actually Adobe/Mozilla OT-SVG fonts do *not* return EM, EM but something like
a few hundred, a few hundred.
The bug fix in freetype2-demos I submitted was that, if it comes out as 1,1, it
means EM, EM (1024, 2048 or there abouts).
Search for "memory exhaustion" in the freetype2-demos commit
Actually Adobe/Mozilla OT-SVG fonts do *not* return EM, EM but something like
a few hundred, a few hundred.
The bug fix in freetype2-demos I submitted was that, if it comes out as 1,1, it
means EM, EM (1024, 2048 or there abouts).
Search for "memory exhaustion" in the freetype2-demos commit
It is the result from the "intrinsic dimensions" routine - (there is a routine
of that sort of name in both rsvg and skia). It returns some larger numbers,
EM,EM I think for Adobe/Mozilla OT-SVG fonts, but 1,1 from rsvg and 0,0 from
skia for Google-origin OT-SVG fonts.
Clear enough?
On
I have no idea what you're talking about. Please, clarify what this
difference is supposed to be, otherwise this is just spreading rumors.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 2:33 PM Hin-Tak Leung
wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 20:49:42 GMT+8, Hin-Tak Leung <
> ht...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 20:49:42 GMT+8, Hin-Tak Leung
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 03:24:11 GMT+8, Cosimo Lupo
wrote:
> > Hin-Tak, what do you mean by "Google OT-SVG fonts"? They're only one
> > OT-SVG format.
> Yes and no. I don't have that many OT-SVG fonts - 3
On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 at 03:24:11 GMT+8, Cosimo Lupo
wrote:
> Hin-Tak, what do you mean by "Google OT-SVG fonts"? They're only one OT-SVG
> format.
Yes and no. I don't have that many OT-SVG fonts - 3 from Adobe/Mozilla sources,
and the rest (more than 2 and less than 10) from Google
Sorry, my bad to forget to add CC.
I thought you mean running make outside of the src/tools/ftbench file (as how
older version works) by non-sourcedir builds. if you mean running from a
seperate build directory, it is working now.
for benchmark.html (also in the attachments):
> quote_type
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
