Ok
Thank you
On Thu 10 May, 2018, 9:40 PM Alexei Podtelezhnikov,
wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Parth Wazurkar
> wrote:
> > In the `FT_Module_Class` structure the module version has been defined as
> > `0x1L` and the required FT version as `0x2L`. Is there any
> specific
> >
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Parth Wazurkar
wrote:
> In the `FT_Module_Class` structure the module version has been defined as
> `0x1L` and the required FT version as `0x2L`. Is there any specific
> significance of numbering the versions in hex?
Hexadecimal is easy to imagine as bina
Hi all,
In the `FT_Module_Class` structure the module version has been defined as
`0x1L` and the required FT version as `0x2L`. Is there any specific
significance of numbering the versions in hex?
Please help.
Thank you
--
Regards
Parth
___
Free
