>>> With patch it is better now, see the attached image.
>>
>> You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly
>> joined! This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally
>> between each glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring. For complex
>> shaping, you need a demo program fr
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> With patch it is better now, see the attached image.
>
> You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly joined!
> This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally between each
> glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring.
On 12 March 2012 13:37, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly joined!
> > This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally between each
> > glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring.
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't support embolding... Patches
> You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly joined!
> This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally between each
> glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring.
Unfortunately, it doesn't support embolding... Patches welcomed :-)
Werner
___
> With patch it is better now, see the attached image.
You must not use ftview to test whether glyphs are correctly joined!
This programs inserts an additional pixel horizontally between each
glyph. For simple stuff, use ftstring. For complex shaping, you need
a demo program from, say, Pango.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:54 PM, suzuki toshiya
wrote:
> I think there are 2 issues in auto-embolden Lohit Devanagari;
> a) disconnection of horizontal strokes (which should be connected with
> previous/next glyph)
On line 357 in ftview.c, I think it is incorrect to double the
strength before it
I tried this issue (unflat horizontal stroke of Lohit Devanagari when
it is autoembolden) on Mac OS X 10.6 on amd64 platform, the issue is
reproduced. The result is attached. I was afraid that some overflow
occurs in ILP32 platform and does not occur in LP64 platform, but it
would not be so simple.
> Unfortunately, auto-emboldened fonts are not a part of ftstring's
> functionality.
Volunteers to implement that are highly welcomed :-)
> Repeating myself, auto-emboldened glyphs should get auto-increased
> advances according to the strength of the emboldening and not based
> on the width. I
> Can i test Freetype auto-embolden with any freetype DEMO?
Yes, e.g. with ftview. Press the space key to cycle through the
rendering modes; one of them does artificial emboldening.
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.or
ftstring is supposed to be an exemplar string renderer for other
libraries because it handles lsb_delta and rsb_delta. This is short of
kerning but at least it is better than ftview. Unfortunately,
auto-emboldened fonts are not a part of ftstring's functionality. So
other libraries could not copy t
Please show Lohit Devanagari with ftview, at appropriate size,
then, hit space bar once. You may find the auto-embolden shapes.
If you hit space bar once more, you may find the auto-oblique shapes.
Regards,
mpsuzuki
pravin@gmail.com wrote:
> yes I think pango is also involve in this. Can i t
On 27 February 2012 22:52, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:41 AM, pravin@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > On 27 February 2012 19:36, Alexei Podtelezhnikov
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:12 AM, pravin@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 27 February 2012 07:58, Alexe
On 27 February 2012 19:36, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:12 AM, pravin@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > On 27 February 2012 07:58, Alexei Podtelezhnikov
> wrote:
> >> wrote:
> >> > I think there are 2 issues in auto-embolden Lohit Devanagari;
> >> > a) disconnection of hor
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Antoine Leca
wrote:
> Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>> In this particular font the glyph width is larger than it advance,
>> which is unusual.
> ... but it is typical of Devanagari fonts, and in general of several
> "hanging" scripts, where the upper bar is require
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:41 AM, pravin@gmail.com
wrote:
> On 27 February 2012 19:36, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:12 AM, pravin@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>> > On 27 February 2012 07:58, Alexei Podtelezhnikov
>> > wrote:
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I think there are 2
Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> In this particular font the glyph width is larger than it advance,
> which is unusual.
... but it is typical of Devanagari fonts, and in general of several
"hanging" scripts, where the upper bar is required to connect at both
ends for most glyphs.
I am not sure if it
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:12 AM, pravin@gmail.com
wrote:
> On 27 February 2012 07:58, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>> wrote:
>> > I think there are 2 issues in auto-embolden Lohit Devanagari;
>> > a) disconnection of horizontal strokes (which should be connected with
>> > previous/next glyph
On 27 February 2012 07:58, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:54 PM, suzuki toshiya
> wrote:
> >
> > I think there are 2 issues in auto-embolden Lohit Devanagari;
> > a) disconnection of horizontal strokes (which should be connected with
> previous/next glyph)4.8
>
> It loo
Dear Alexei,
Thank you for trying to reproduce this issue.
Today I'm out of my office and I don't bring 64-bit machine,
but I have some (Debian GNU/Linux and Mac OS X on amd64),
I will try within a few days.
Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:54 PM, suzuki toshiya
> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:54 PM, suzuki toshiya
wrote:
>
> I think there are 2 issues in auto-embolden Lohit Devanagari;
> a) disconnection of horizontal strokes (which should be connected with
> previous/next glyph)4.8
It looks like advance value is incorrectly adjusted or calculated.
I was abl
2012/2/25 suzuki toshiya
> Dear Alexei,
>
> Thank you again for comment. I think your comment (the lower-left
> corner of the horizontal stroke is interpreted as Bezier curve)
> is reasonable, although yet I've not checked how they are interpreted
> yet (sorry for my laziness).
>
> I think there
Dear Alexei,
Thank you again for comment. I think your comment (the lower-left
corner of the horizontal stroke is interpreted as Bezier curve)
is reasonable, although yet I've not checked how they are interpreted
yet (sorry for my laziness).
I think there are 2 issues in auto-embolden Lohit Devan
Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using
auto bold algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see
http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/Screenshot.png
>>
>> It seems that FreeType 2.4.5 shows same problem.
>
> I think it is clear what is happening: instead of
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:54 AM, suzuki toshiya
wrote:
>> Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:05 AM, pravin@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
Lohit Devanagari does not have Bold variant and presently using auto bold
algorithm. It does not work correctly in gnome see
>>
It seems that FreeType 2.4.5 shows same problem.
suzuki toshiya wrote:
> Dear Alexei,
>
> Thank you for notice, the latest FreeType2 shows the problem.
> I will check if the previous stroker shows no problem.
>
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
>
> Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:
25 matches
Mail list logo
