In particular, it appears to me that the ARM system is doing some
incorrect math from the metrics width value of 0x2C0 to get 0x800,
but I'm having trouble identifying why this might be.
Finally, can you decorate the various functions of ftcalc.c with
some printf calls to find out where the
: Werner LEMBERG [mailto:w...@gnu.org]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 5:50 AM
To: t...@spraguetech.com
Cc: freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Math error? Spacing drastically different VS2005 to
GNU/ARM (v2.4.4)
My question is: where should I look and/or what should I change, to
make
My question is: where should I look and/or what should I change, to
make them act the same?
The FT_INT64 stuff is only used in a single file, `src/base/ftcalc.c'.
However, AFAIK, the GNU C compiler always defines a 64bit data type
(`long long int'), so I'm really surprised that you experience
In particular, it appears to me that the ARM system is doing some
incorrect math from the metrics width value of 0x2C0 to get 0x800,
but I'm having trouble identifying why this might be.
Finally, can you decorate the various functions of ftcalc.c with
some printf calls to find out where the
