Re: [ft-devel] Regarding FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS

2018-06-06 Thread Parth Wazurkar
> > I also found this flag in `src/pcf/pcfread.c.' Maybe this can be removed > too? > Yeah! Thanks! -- Parth ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Re: [ft-devel] Regarding FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS

2018-06-06 Thread Parth Wazurkar
> > >> I found that for the bdf driver in `bdfdrivr.c` the > >> `FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS` flag is active for face_flags. But in > >> `freetype.h` it has been stated as `THIS FLAG IS DEPRECATED. DO NOT > >> USE OR TEST IT`. I doubt if this has been done intentionally. > > >Right, it's an

Re: [ft-devel] Regarding FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS

2018-06-06 Thread Nikhil Ramakrishnan
Hi, > I found that for the bdf driver in `bdfdrivr.c` the > `FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS` flag is active for face_flags. But in > `freetype.h` it has been stated as `THIS FLAG IS DEPRECATED. DO NOT USE OR > TEST IT`. > I also found this flag in `src/pcf/pcfread.c.' Maybe this can be removed too?

Re: [ft-devel] Regarding FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS

2018-06-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I found that for the bdf driver in `bdfdrivr.c` the > `FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS` flag is active for face_flags. But in > `freetype.h` it has been stated as `THIS FLAG IS DEPRECATED. DO NOT > USE OR TEST IT`. I doubt if this has been done intentionally. Right, it's an oversight. Please

[ft-devel] Regarding FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS

2018-06-05 Thread Parth Wazurkar
Hi all, I found that for the bdf driver in `bdfdrivr.c` the `FT_FACE_FLAG_FAST_GLYPHS` flag is active for face_flags. But in `freetype.h` it has been stated as `THIS FLAG IS DEPRECATED. DO NOT USE OR TEST IT`. I doubt if this has been done intentionally. Does this cause any difference? Please