On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 12:01, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I believe you that this fix is necessary -- you certainly have a font
which exhibits this behaviour. However, the fact that it is possible
to have NULL values in the `BaseRecord' table (similar to the
`ComponentRecord' table as used in GPOS
I believe there is a bug in the opentype validator.
If I have a MarkToBase table with multiple mark classes and multiple
bases, and where at least one base is missing an attachment site
(anchor) for at least one mark class, then the validator will still
attempt to validate the missing anchor.
I believe there is a bug in the opentype validator.
Is it a bug?
If I have a MarkToBase table with multiple mark classes and multiple
bases, and where at least one base is missing an attachment site
(anchor) for at least one mark class, then the validator will still
attempt to validate the
