Applied. However, I think there is a mistake for the
SingleSubstFormat1 case:
idx = otv_Coverage_get_first( Coverage ) + DeltaGlyphID;
if ( idx 0 ||
idx + DeltaGlyphID 0||
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 08:56, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Applied. However, I think there is a mistake for the
SingleSubstFormat1 case:
idx = otv_Coverage_get_first( Coverage ) + DeltaGlyphID;
if ( idx 0 ||
idx +
That entire patch chunk was wrong (and unneeded in the first
place). This should back it out.
Applied, thanks.
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Please apply the otvmathconstant patch
Applied.
The patch coverageCount passes an extra argument to
otv_Coverage_validate (the expected number of glyphs, or -1 if this
is not known -- it isn't always) and then checks that these counts
match.
Applied.
I may be wrong, and perhaps the
I blush to admit that I miscounted the number of constants in one of the
tables (there are 56 not 57).
Please apply the otvmathconstant patch
On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 11:24, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Suzuki-san, what do you think and/or suggest?
I have a couple of general questions. Probably for
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 15:35, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 18:06 -0400, George Williams wrote:
I am working on a validator for the MATH table to slot it in to otvalid.
Hi George,
Any spec on the MATH table available online?
Thanks
No, MS hasn't made it public yet.
