[ft-devel] Potential GSoC Proposal

Hi, I am a CSE student from IIT Roorkee India, and I would like to participate in GSoC with Free-Type organisation. 1. I would like to contribute in conversion of documentation of Free Type from HTML to markdown from now on itself to strengthen my candidature instead of proposing it as GSoC

Re: [ft-devel] LLP64 model outside Win64

>> Certainly, if you are going to dynamically allocate a slot for it. >> I tried to avoid that. > > Totally untested, but why wouldn't this work? > > [...] > > - if ( FT_List_Find( >composites, > - FT_UINT_TO_POINTER( glyph_index ) ) ) > + if ( FT_List_Find(

Re: [ft-devel] Potential GSoC Proposal

Sir by using Jekyll we can also solve the problem the problem of cross reference and generation of ready to view HTML as normally done on Github .And using that only task will be conversion of code from HTML to markdown. ___ Freetype-devel mailing list

Re: [ft-devel] Potential GSoC Proposal

Hello Ankit! > Hi, I am a CSE student from IIT Roorkee India, and I would like to > participate in GSoC with Free-Type organisation. For future reference: It's `FreeType', not `Free-Type' or `Free Type'. > 1. I would like to contribute in conversion of documentation of Free >Type from

Re: [ft-devel] Potential GSoC Proposal

> Sir by using Jekyll we can also solve the problem the problem of > cross reference and generation of ready to view HTML as normally > done on Github. And using that only task will be conversion of code > from HTML to markdown. Well, there is still the `docmaker' issue... But it's good to

Re: [ft-devel] LLP64 model outside Win64

>>> - if ( FT_List_Find( >composites, >>> - FT_UINT_TO_POINTER( glyph_index ) ) ) >>> + if ( FT_List_Find( >composites, index ) ) >> >> How shall this work? You are going to store pointers to integers >> in a list. As a consequence, two identical integers can

Re: [ft-devel] LLP64 model outside Win64

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> Certainly, if you are going to dynamically allocate a slot for it. >>> I tried to avoid that. >> >> Totally untested, but why wouldn't this work? >> >> [...] >> >> - if ( FT_List_Find( >composites, >> -