>> WL> Please redo the patch so that the old code gets saved within a #if 0
>> WL> ... #endif clause (to stay as a reference),
>>
>> (having the old code in the repo’s history is not enough? :^)
>
> I agree with James. Disabled code only clutters the code base...
In most circumstances, I fully
On 04/05/11 17:04, James Cloos wrote:
> WL> Looks good, thanks!
>
> WL> Please redo the patch so that the old code gets saved within a #if 0
> WL> ... #endif clause (to stay as a reference),
>
> (having the old code in the repo’s history is not enough? :^)
I agree with James. Disabled code onl
> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG writes:
WL> Looks good, thanks!
WL> Please redo the patch so that the old code gets saved within a #if 0
WL> ... #endif clause (to stay as a reference),
(having the old code in the repo’s history is not enough? :^)
WL> and add a comment to the new code (essentiall
> Please consider pulling the master branch of:
>
> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~cloos/freetype2.git
>
> to receive the patch below.
Looks good, thanks! Please redo the patch so that the old code gets
saved within a #if 0 ... #endif clause (to stay as a reference), and
add a comment to the ne
