Re: [ft-devel] scale F_dot_P down

2012-12-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> ttinterp.c:2706: After checking if F_dot_P is smaller than a > threshold, it is assigned a maximum possible value rather than a > threshold value. Is it possible that there is one zero too many on > line 2706 and we meant to assign a threshold value? I think the current code is correct: If the

[ft-devel] scale F_dot_P down

2012-12-06 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
Werner, Before you look at my patch can you check that those are not bugs on the following lines? ttinterp.c:2706: After checking if F_dot_P is smaller than a threshold, it is assigned a maximum possible value rather than a threshold value. Is it possible that there is one zero too many on line 2