[ft-devel] Variable fonts: hhea/typo/win metrics interpreted differently for instances compared to static fonts?
Hi list, I'm trying to turn Cantarell into a VF and am hitting a hhea/typo/win metrics issue: the metrics seem to be interpreted differently for the VF instances compared to the static fonts an I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong. The instances look as if their baseline was shifted upwards relative to the static fonts. Equalizing hhea and typo metrics makes the difference go away. Here's a screenshot of the baseline difference: https://github.com/googlei18n/fontmake/issues/492#issuecomment-447760311 Here are the three static masters and the resulting VF: https://github.com/googlei18n/fontmake/issues/492#issuecomment-448005088 (Note that the Regular serves as the master for various fields, e.g. the "Use Typo Metrics" bit. Toggling it does not help.) This happens on master and on 2.9.1. Am I overlooking something? ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Re: [ft-devel] color framework
> All I'm asking is, if FT_LOAD_COLOR is passed to FT_Load_Glyph() then color > bitmap be rendered. How it trickles down the abstractions and machinery > into render, you can change. You object to explicit spelling FT_LOAD_COLOR | FT_LOAD_TARGET_BGRA | FT_LOAD_RENDER. Otherwise, you understand the issue. I think the explicit language makes code clearer. ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
