Re: [ft-devel] Another font variation bug fix

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Matthias Clasen <matthias.cla...@gmail.com> wrote: > the important change is the last hunk. > > We store coords[i] in the local variable coord, then we apply the clamping > to coord, but then ... > we use coords[i] as input for the normaliza

Re: [ft-devel] Another font variation bug fix

the important change is the last hunk. We store coords[i] in the local variable coord, then we apply the clamping to coord, but then ... we use coords[i] as input for the normalization, so the clamping is lost. That is what my patch changes. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Werner LEMBERG

[ft-devel] Another font variation bug fix

Here is a small fix that we came upon while working on font variations support for pango From 723b01eadd71549b7315fd20d858d043ed9e9562 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Clasen <mcla...@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:06:02 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix clamping of font variatio

Re: [ft-devel] Minor FT_Set_Var_Design_Coordinates() request

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Hi Werner, > > Is there any chance you can modify FT_Set_Var_Design_Coordinates() to > detect when the set face coordinates are not changed and shortcircuit out > early? Currently, if one calls that function too often

Re: [ft-devel] Problem with FT_Get_MM_Var

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Too old. You need this fix that went into 2.8.1: > > https://github.com/behdad/freetype/commit/55bbb98f5c5a89230127d6b998a6e2 > 3e634b5d0e > > > Thanks, that fixes this issue.

Re: [ft-devel] Problem with FT_Get_MM_Var

Using freetype-2.8-5.fc27.x86_64 here. ___ Freetype-devel mailing list Freetype-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel

Re: [ft-devel] Problem with FT_Get_MM_Var

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > The cairo code I see this problem with essentially does: > > > > FT_New_Face (font_map->ft_library, > > unscaled->filename, > > unscaled->id, > >

Re: [ft-devel] Problem with FT_Get_MM_Var

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > I am working on adding font variations support to cairo, and I am > > hitting a strange problem in my tests: the first call to > > FT_Get_MM_Var after FT_New_Face fails with an error code of 85. If > > I simply repeat the

[ft-devel] Problem with FT_Get_MM_Var

I am working on adding font variations support to cairo, and I am hitting a strange problem in my tests: the first call to FT_Get_MM_Var after FT_New_Face fails with an error code of 85. If I simply repeat the FT_Get_MM_Var call, everything is fine and things work as expected.

Re: [ft-devel] Re: Problem enabling new language on gdm language selection list

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:45 +0530, Rahul Bhalerao wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What gdm does it is only shows a language in the list if a) we have translations for it and b) we have fonts for it. For b), we basically ask fontconfig do

Re: [ft-devel] FreeType version 2.2.1 released

We looked at updating freetype to 2.2.1 in Fedora recently, but discovered that libXfont still depends on the internal freetype headers (in the X 7.1 release candidate). So I wondered if anybody has a libXfont patch. There is none on the list of rogue clients... Matthias

RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2

On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:06 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I'd really like to have a report telling me which package still use theses. Unfortunately, I don't have the time and disk space to download all sources repositories of various distros. this would be hugely useful

[ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal

Here is an (untested) patch to remove the use of internal freetype headers in fonttosfnt. I did not try to fix Xprint, which seems to actually make use of the internals. Matthias --- xorg-x11-6.8.2/xc/programs/fonttosfnt/util.c.freetype-internals 2005-10-13 13:02:25.0 -0400 +++

RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2

On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 10:44 +0200, Turner, David wrote: There is something I'd like to ask to anyone having access to the *complete* sources of a distribution, because it will help us prioritize the patches. I'm thinking about Owen Tayloy, Frédéric Crozat and possibly others: - would it

[ft-devel] Status of 2.2

Hi, I'm investigating whether I should update Rawhide to freetype 2.1.10. A number of questions come up: - Do you have any idea how far out 2.2 still is ? - Will 2.2 be libfreetype.so.7 ? - Do you still plan to break source compat by doing const correctness changes ? - Does