On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 11:52 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad to hear that. In addition, I'm not sure if
validating OT-tables only is sufficient. For example,
otvalid checks whether the substituted glyph ID by
GSUB is within the range declared by maxp.
I suppose HarfBuzz lets the
I have a question about freetype and harfbuzz. FreeType1 includes
an extension to support OpenType text layout processing. But this
support hasn't become part of FreeType2. Why? Why does FreeType2
not use the codes of harfbuzz to support OpenType text layout
processing?
We have decided
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 01:48 -0400, LingNing Zhang wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about freetype and harfbuzz.
FreeType1 includes an extension to support OpenType text layout
processing. But this support hasn't become part of FreeType2. Why?
Why does FreeType2 not use the codes of harfbuzz
On Mon, 28 May 2007 13:48:20 +0800
LingNing Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about freetype and harfbuzz.
FreeType1 includes an extension to support OpenType text layout
processing. But this support hasn't become part of FreeType2. Why?
Why does FreeType2 not use the
# Personally, I'm one of the people who want FT2 to have support for
# text layout feature. I guess I feel sympathy with you. But we
# are minority among FT2 developers :-).
Perhaps a misunderstanding: I don't object to make FreeType handle
OpenType tables (see the validating stuff which we
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 02:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 13:48:20 +0800
LingNing Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question about freetype and harfbuzz.
FreeType1 includes an extension to support OpenType text layout
processing. But this support hasn't
Dear Sirs,
Before all, Werner asked the question that I wanted to ask,
thank you very much.
On Mon, 28 May 2007 08:42:10 +0200 (CEST)
Werner LEMBERG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Personally, I'm one of the people who want FT2 to have support for
# text layout feature. I guess I feel sympathy
