On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 12:22:45AM +0100, David Turner wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:54:14AM -0500, david turner wrote:
I've also discovered that Debian Woody uses 2.0.9, while Sarge uses 2.1.2.
Uh, that's not the case, FWIW. Woody does use 2.0.9, but Sarge uses 2.1.7.
Thanks steve,
Steve Langasek a écrit :
Ok. I don't suppose you have any sort of ETA for a release that includes
this ABI compatibility? I understand the desire to avoid an ABI transition,
but from my POV the delays in settling on a final ABI are much more
problematic than the details of what that ABI would
Steve Langasek a écrit :
Hi David,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:54:14AM -0500, david turner wrote:
I've also discovered that Debian Woody uses 2.0.9, while Sarge uses 2.1.2.
Uh, that's not the case, FWIW. Woody does use 2.0.9, but Sarge uses 2.1.7.
Thanks steve, this certainly
Hi David,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 09:54:14AM -0500, david turner wrote:
I've also discovered that Debian Woody uses 2.0.9, while Sarge uses 2.1.2.
Uh, that's not the case, FWIW. Woody does use 2.0.9, but Sarge uses 2.1.7.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
