> Filed here:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50848
Thanks.
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
Filed here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50848
behdad
On 06/07/2012 05:47 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>>> It depends on a flag in the glyph's data, ROUND_XY_TO_GRID, if the
>>> subglyph's offset is given as xy values. However, for the
>>> particular DejaVu glyph, the subglyphs
On 06/07/2012 05:47 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> I wonder how such glaring problems can be part of one of the most used
> free fonts.
That was my first thought too. Of course, I only noticed this because I made
hb-view print ANSI-art if outputting to a terminal!
__
> See "Spooky G", attached :).
This *is* nice!
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>> It depends on a flag in the glyph's data, ROUND_XY_TO_GRID, if the
>> subglyph's offset is given as xy values. However, for the
>> particular DejaVu glyph, the subglyphs all have a zero offset, but
>> point coordinates are rounded to integers anyways as part of the
>> normal rasterization proc
On 06/07/2012 04:20 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
BTW, checkout DejaVuSans at 4pt. I see all kinds of triangular
artifacts.
>>>
>>> Not my problem :-) According to the font's gasp table, hinting
>>> should be switched off below 9pt.
>>
>> See attachment.
>
> Yes, I know. I can only repeat:
On 06/07/2012 04:20 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
BTW, checkout DejaVuSans at 4pt. I see all kinds of triangular
artifacts.
>>>
>>> Not my problem :-) According to the font's gasp table, hinting
>>> should be switched off below 9pt.
>>
>> See attachment.
>
> Yes, I know. I can only repeat:
What's wrong with that?
Stick it on a canvas, call it modern art and you'll make a fortune.
Sent from my iPigeon
On 7 Jun 2012, at 23:10, "Behdad Esfahbod" wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 03:28 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, checkout DejaVuSans at 4pt. I see all kinds of triangular
>>> artifac
>>> BTW, checkout DejaVuSans at 4pt. I see all kinds of triangular
>>> artifacts.
>>
>> Not my problem :-) According to the font's gasp table, hinting
>> should be switched off below 9pt.
>
> See attachment.
Yes, I know. I can only repeat: The bytecode goes havoc because it
doesn't work at this
On 06/07/2012 03:25 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> Great time for asking then: are subglyph positions rounded as part
>> of the hinting process?
>
> It depends on a flag in the glyph's data, ROUND_XY_TO_GRID, if the
> subglyph's offset is given as xy values. However, for the particular
> DejaVu
> BTW, checkout DejaVuSans at 4pt. I see all kinds of triangular
> artifacts.
Not my problem :-) According to the font's gasp table, hinting should
be switched off below 9pt.
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
https
> Great time for asking then: are subglyph positions rounded as part
> of the hinting process?
It depends on a flag in the glyph's data, ROUND_XY_TO_GRID, if the
subglyph's offset is given as xy values. However, for the particular
DejaVu glyph, the subglyphs all have a zero offset, but point
coo
BTW, checkout DejaVuSans at 4pt. I see all kinds of triangular artifacts.
On 06/07/2012 12:40 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 01:56 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>
>>> I was playing with Unicode box characters, and noticed that DejaVu
>>> Sans creates the glyph for ▟ out of three quadrant
On 06/05/2012 01:56 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> I was playing with Unicode box characters, and noticed that DejaVu
>> Sans creates the glyph for ▟ out of three quadrant boxes. At
>> different sizes I can see very noticeable seams where the sub-glyphs
>> meet. I thought FreeType would handle t
> I was playing with Unicode box characters, and noticed that DejaVu
> Sans creates the glyph for ▟ out of three quadrant boxes. At
> different sizes I can see very noticeable seams where the sub-glyphs
> meet. I thought FreeType would handle these cases better, but seems
> like I'm wrong. Any
Hi,
I was playing with Unicode box characters, and noticed that DejaVu Sans
creates the glyph for ▟ out of three quadrant boxes. At different sizes I can
see very noticeable seams where the sub-glyphs meet. I thought FreeType would
handle these cases better, but seems like I'm wrong. Any ideas?
16 matches
Mail list logo