On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:06 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >
> > I'd really like to have a report telling me which package still
> > use theses. Unfortunately, I don't have the time and disk space
> > to download all sources repositories of various distros.
> >
> > this would be huge
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 10:44 +0200, Turner, David wrote:
> There is something I'd like to ask to anyone having access to the
> *complete* sources of a distribution, because it will help us prioritize
> the patches. I'm thinking about Owen Tayloy, Frédéric Crozat and
> possibly others:
>
> - would
On Thursday 06 October 2005 10:44, Turner, David wrote:
> > I'm investigating whether I should update Rawhide to freetype 2.1.10.
> > A number of questions come up:
> > - Do you have any idea how far out 2.2 still is ?
>
> Not precisely, mainly because I haven't had the time to provide
> patches f
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 10:44 +0200, Turner, David wrote:
> > I'm investigating whether I should update Rawhide to freetype 2.1.10.
> > A number of questions come up:
> > - Do you have any idea how far out 2.2 still is ?
> >
>
> Not precisely, mainly because I haven't had the time to provide
> patc
Le jeudi 06 octobre 2005 à 10:44 +0200, Turner, David a écrit :
> > I'm investigating whether I should update Rawhide to freetype 2.1.10.
> > A number of questions come up:
> > - Do you have any idea how far out 2.2 still is ?
> >
>
> Not precisely, mainly because I haven't had the time to provid
MAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc : freetype-devel@nongnu.org
> Objet : Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2
>
>
> On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 09:18 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:24:49 -0400
> > Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Turner, David wrote:
>
> There is something I'd like to ask to anyone having access to the
> *complete* sources of a distribution, because it will help us prioritize
> the patches. I'm thinking about Owen Tayloy, Frédéric Crozat and
> possibly others:
>
> - would it be possib
> I'm investigating whether I should update Rawhide to freetype 2.1.10.
> A number of questions come up:
> - Do you have any idea how far out 2.2 still is ?
>
Not precisely, mainly because I haven't had the time to provide
patches for all major libraries. At the moment, both Pango and
LibXft have
> - Do you have any idea how far out 2.2 still is ?
It's still far away because I currently have limited time to work on.
> - Will 2.2 be libfreetype.so.7 ?
Yes. At least this is my opinion.
> - Do you still plan to break source compat by doing const
>correctness changes ?
I would li
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 09:18 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:24:49 -0400
> Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Does FT_OPTIMIZE_MEMORY still break apps ? I know that Pango
> > has been patched, but I hear xfs segfaults with the memory
> > optimizati
Hi,
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:24:49 -0400
Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Does FT_OPTIMIZE_MEMORY still break apps ? I know that Pango
> has been patched, but I hear xfs segfaults with the memory
> optimizations. Are there patches beyond the (applied) pango
> patches to fix brea
Hi,
I'm investigating whether I should update Rawhide to freetype 2.1.10.
A number of questions come up:
- Do you have any idea how far out 2.2 still is ?
- Will 2.2 be libfreetype.so.7 ?
- Do you still plan to break source compat by doing const
correctness changes ?
- Does FT_OPTIMIZE_MEM
12 matches
Mail list logo
