On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Hugh McMaster wrote:
> > I'm cutting a new version today or tomorrow. Any last urgent things
> > to consider?
>
> Please package rasterinfo.html in ft2docs. It's been missing for
> several releases now.
Do you mean
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 22:27, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 8:10 AM Hugh McMaster wrote:
> > Please package rasterinfo.html in ft2docs. It's been missing for
> > several releases now.
>
> Do you mean
> https://www.freetype.org/freetype2/docs/rasterinfo/rasterinfo.html ?
>
Hi Werner,
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 18:37, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> I'm cutting a new version today or tomorrow. Any last urgent things
> to consider?
Please package rasterinfo.html in ft2docs. It's been missing for
several releases now.
Thank you,
Hugh
When I run `pkg-config --modversion freetype2` on my Ubuntu 20.04, I get
weird version number: `23.1.17`. This does not look like a freetype version
number at all to me. Meanwhile, `apt show libfreetype6` gives me `Version:
2.10.1-2`. Could someone explain what this pkg-config version number is?
Hi Werner
> I'm cutting a new version today or tomorrow. Any last urgent things
> to consider?
Copyright years in ftver.rc and all of freetype2-demos. Thank you for the last
fix.
Alexei
>>> Do you mean
>>> https://www.freetype.org/freetype2/docs/rasterinfo/rasterinfo.html ?
>>> I do not think RasterInfo.ttf was ever considered a part of FreeType.
>>
>> Yes, that's what I was referring to. If not included, the packaged
>> documentation is left with a broken section.
>
> Do you
>>> Please package rasterinfo.html in ft2docs. It's been missing for
>>> several releases now.
>>
>> Do you mean
>> https://www.freetype.org/freetype2/docs/rasterinfo/rasterinfo.html ?
>> I do not think RasterInfo.ttf was ever considered a part of FreeType.
>
> Yes, that's what I was
FreeType 2.10.2 has been released.
It is available from
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/freetype/
or
http://sourceforge.net/projects/freetype/files/
The latter site also holds older versions of the FreeType library.
See below for the relevant snippet from the CHANGES file.
> Can I create a separate branch in the freetype2 repository as suggested by
> Werner? (
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/freetype-devel/2020-05/msg00033.html)
You did the right thing :-)
>> * I ask you to put your stuff into a private branch called
>> 'xxx-projectname', with 'xxx'
> When I run `pkg-config --modversion freetype2` on my Ubuntu 20.04, I
> get weird version number: `23.1.17`. This does not look like a
> freetype version number at all to me.
It's the libtool version, which is the important thing. It is an
abomination to make tarball versions equal to DLL
Folks,
I'm cutting a new version today or tomorrow. Any last urgent things
to consider?
Werner
> As according to my GSOC project which is integrating an external
> logging library with FreeType. I need some help gathering the
> requirements that the external library should satisfy.
>
> From earlier discussion, below are basic some requirements:
>
> 1. It should be written in C language
12 matches
Mail list logo
