> let me reformulate: is "glyph hinted bounding box" always the output
> bitmap of any render operation?
It's still not clear to me what you are after, sorry. Are you talking
about the metrics? The actual bitmap dimensions?
Again: Please provide an example what you want to achieve.
>>> I think it would be possible for FT_Load_Glyph to implement this
>>> operation on its own without FT_Property_Set. Is there any plan
>>> that the Freetype will provide this characteristic?
>>
>> This is issue https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?43380.
>
> I would like to ask you to solve
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 05:25:25PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > let me reformulate: is "glyph hinted bounding box" always the output
> > bitmap of any render operation?
>
> It's still not clear to me what you are after, sorry. Are you talking
> about the metrics? The actual bitmap
> The bitmap dimensions. For a 'g' glyph opentype outline for
> instance, if I load it and render it using the LCD(RGB) related
> options, the resulting bitmap dimensions are the bounding box of the
> glyph. Is this true for any glyph outline rendering mode
> (monochrome, grayscale..)?
I
Hello Werner,
I write a "new" Makefile (freed from a lot of "brick-a-brack" and tested)
for building FreeType Library easily on an AmigaOne (AmigaOS 4.1 Final
Edition Update 1): attached "Makefile".
It makes a "libfreetype.a" (linked with ftinit.ppc.o and ftsystem.ppc.o,
too) static library
> In the runtime, what is the appropriate way to render the MS legacy
> fonts(Tahoma, Arial, ...) as v35 and the MS ClearType
> fonts(Consolas, ...) as v40? Microsoft Windows GDI displays two
> types of fonts at the same time.
>
> PSEUDO CODE:
>
> gasp_version = get_gasp_version( font
> Is this expected that lcd loading and rendering is done on the R/G/B
> glyph biggest bounding boxes or am I using freetype wrongly?
I don't understand the question. Please give an example.
Werner
___
Freetype mailing list
Freetype@nongnu.org
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:19:13PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Is this expected that lcd loading and rendering is done on the R/G/B
> > glyph biggest bounding boxes or am I using freetype wrongly?
>
> I don't understand the question. Please give an example.
Hi,
let me reformulate: is
On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 11:53:10 +0100 (CET), Werner Lemberg wrote:
>
>> In the runtime, what is the appropriate way to render the MS legacy
>> fonts(Tahoma, Arial, ...) as v35 and the MS ClearType
>> fonts(Consolas, ...) as v40? Microsoft Windows GDI displays two
>> types of fonts at the same
