Re: [ft] Fat strokes getting cropped
> Is there a "proper" way to get the advance for a glyph that has been > stroked or do I just use the non stroked advance and add 2 * the > stroke width? What you want to do seems the right solution. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
RE: [ft] Fat strokes getting cropped
Is there a "proper" way to get the advance for a glyph that has been stroked or do I just use the non stroked advance and add 2 * the stroke width? Erik -Original Message- From: Werner LEMBERG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 9 december 2008 18:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ft] Fat strokes getting cropped > The head revision worked like a charm... thanks! Do you list > planned stable releases somewhere? We only have stable releases. I'll probably prepare a new one for end of December. Werner __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3677 (20081209) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3682 (20081210) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
Re: [ft] Fat strokes getting cropped
> The head revision worked like a charm... thanks! Do you list > planned stable releases somewhere? We only have stable releases. I'll probably prepare a new one for end of December. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
RE: [ft] Fat strokes getting cropped
The head revision worked like a charm... thanks! Do you list planned stable releases somewhere? Erik -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Werner LEMBERG Sent: den 8 december 2008 23:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ft] Fat strokes getting cropped > I'm using freetype 2.3.7 to render a color glyph that has another > color stroke to a bitmap via direct rendering. It works well, but > I've noticed that when the stroke width grows beyond a certain limit > the spans appear to get cropped on the right side. Please test the current CVS; I think I've fixed this issue already. >From the CHANGES file: - The smooth renderer produced truncated images (on the right) for outline parts with negative horizontal values. Most fonts don't contain outlines left to the y coordinate axis, but the effect was very noticeable for outlines processed with FT_Glyph_Stroke, using thick strokes. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3674 (20081209) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3676 (20081209) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
Re: [ft] Fat strokes getting cropped
> I'm using freetype 2.3.7 to render a color glyph that has another > color stroke to a bitmap via direct rendering. It works well, but > I've noticed that when the stroke width grows beyond a certain limit > the spans appear to get cropped on the right side. Please test the current CVS; I think I've fixed this issue already. >From the CHANGES file: - The smooth renderer produced truncated images (on the right) for outline parts with negative horizontal values. Most fonts don't contain outlines left to the y coordinate axis, but the effect was very noticeable for outlines processed with FT_Glyph_Stroke, using thick strokes. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
