Re: [Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-10 Thread Hans Meine
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 14:54, Rob Shortt wrote: Apache+PHP == bloat. We used to use apache, now we have an extremely lightweight webserver that is part of Freevo. It goes along the same lines as why we don't use MySQL. OK. Fine with me, IMO implementing a web-frontend in python should

Re: [Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-09 Thread Wan Tat Chee
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Hans Meine wrote: On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:56, Florian Demmer wrote: just a thought: if there were a way to access the smbus system using php, apache/php could simplifly creation of a stable and fast web part of freevo... I'd suggest something lightweight

Re: [Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-08 Thread Florian Demmer
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 20:51:46 -0400, Michael Ruelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dischi, The only reservation i have is leaving a stable webserver. [...] just a thought: if there were a way to access the smbus system using php, apache/php could simplifly creation of a stable and fast web part of

Re: [Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-08 Thread Rob Shortt
Florian Demmer wrote: just a thought: if there were a way to access the smbus system using php, apache/php could simplifly creation of a stable and fast web part of freevo... Apache+PHP == bloat. We used to use apache, now we have an extremely lightweight webserver that is part of Freevo. It

Re: [Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-08 Thread Hans Meine
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:56, Florian Demmer wrote: just a thought: if there were a way to access the smbus system using php, apache/php could simplifly creation of a stable and fast web part of freevo... There are many pro's and con's of an integrated webserver vs. a separate one.

Re: [Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-07 Thread Bruno Tavares
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 18:19, Dirk Meyer wrote: Hi, some already know because I told it on IRC, but here the official request for discussion: I don't like twisted. Why? It's a huge monster, including not only stuff we need like xmlrpc and a web server but also stuff we don't need and a

[Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-06 Thread Dirk Meyer
Hi, some already know because I told it on IRC, but here the official request for discussion: I don't like twisted. Why? It's a huge monster, including not only stuff we need like xmlrpc and a web server but also stuff we don't need and a main loop that is too complex. I saw in the code that it

Re: [Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-06 Thread Mick
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 01:19, Dirk Meyer wrote: Hi, some already know because I told it on IRC, but here the official request for discussion: I don't like twisted. Why? It's a huge monster, including not only stuff we need like xmlrpc and a web server but also stuff we don't need and a

Re: [Freevo-devel] switching to pynotifier and pymbus

2004-09-06 Thread Rob Shortt
Dirk Meyer wrote: I don't like twisted. Why? It's a huge monster, including not only stuff we need like xmlrpc and a web server but also stuff we don't need and a main loop that is too complex. I saw in the code that it waits for dead children not started by any part of twisted .. Hey, that are my