Well, yea, you're onto a parallel design there. I'm
usually referring to the individual instances of physical
processes that correspond to the general models of 'basins of
attraction'.
When you say individual instances of physical processes, I translate that to a
specific trajectory
On the topic of calculators - I see that HP are to re-release the HP-35 this
summer in celebration of its 35th anniversary. At last! I can get myself an
RPN calculator that isn't littered with redundant financial functions.
R
On 4/7/07, Owen Densmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the Mac
Another issue of Journal of Artificial Societies Social Simulation has
been released. The article on empirical validation was OK but somewhat
waffly.
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk
Robert
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets
Well, I'll start now and probably need to get back to it tonight...
On 4/10/07, Stephen Guerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, yea, you're onto a parallel design there. I'm
usually referring to the individual instances of physical
processes that correspond to the general models of
Thanks Paul, great share, must-read,
db
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: friam@redfish.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] predictive models v. causal mechanisms
Folks,
If you've already heard about or read Alan Beyerchen's paper,
Clausewitz, Nonlinearity, and the Unpredictability of War, then delete
and be happy.
Else, check out the paper at:
http://www.clausewitz.com/CWZHOME/Beyerchen/CWZandNonlinearity.htm
--
Ray Parks
