** reminder today **
** note special day and time **
Robert Axtell
External Faculty, Santa Fe Institute
Professor, George Mason University, Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study,
Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study
TITLE: Informal Chat on Agent-Based Modeling and Generative Social Science
TIME:
David Breecker wrote:
One of the key findings was that the way scientists tend to discuss
issues like certainty, and their dialectical method of taking
exception to perceived flaws in one another's work, has hampered our
ability to convey the urgency of the climate change situation and the
Thanks David,
Yes it has been a great discussion, but with little reference to science.
For those of you interested in the scientific study of climate change and
global
warming here is the site of the IPCC:
_http://www.ipcc.ch/_ (http://www.ipcc.ch/)
and a Columbia study on ice
FYI Paul
Science 10 August 2007:
Vol. 317. no. 5839, pp. 746 - 747
DOI: 10.1126/science.317.5839.746
News Focus
CLIMATE CHANGE:
Humans and Nature Duel Over the Next Decade's Climate
Richard A. Kerr
Rising greenhouse gases are changing global climate, but during the next few
Nicholas Thompson wrote:
The best argument for worrying about global warming presented so far in
this interesting correspondence is the one that says it costs us relatively
little to worry about it and and costs us LOT if we dont.
Sort of like Pascal's argument for prayer, right?
The
Climate change and economic impacts. cheers Paul
** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
---BeginMessage---
Dear Colleagues,
UNDP Zambia is working with the Government of Zambia through the Ministry of
It's evidently a sign the whole thing is unimportant that people indulge
in the luxury of abstract debate for making their decisions. If it
were perceived as real, wouldn't we make decisions the normal way?
Phil Henshaw .·´ ¯ `·.
David,
Can you explain this relation a bit further. Sorry if I am being dim, but I
did not quite understand your comment. Let's say we are on the QE2 which, for
some reason is inclined to be a bit tippy. We notice that the passengers are
gathering on the right side of the ship, which is
Sorry Nick, I inadvertantly omitted your key question to which I was
replying, which was:
I do worry about complexity thinking leading to fatalism. If a
goddamned
butterfly can cause a climate crash, why take responsibility for
ANYTHING
we do. We should all be dionysians.
I think Kant
Nick,
The good idea is a hypothetical imperative as it compels actions in a given
circumstance (not all circumstances): if it will aid the boat's stability, I
should move to the opposite side.
If you want a categorical imperative that would be applicable, I'd suggest: I
should not act like a
Glen -
One of the necessary steps toward a useful dialect about anthropogenic
climate change is: stop abusing English.
I think you lead with your chin on this one... someone deliberately
spoofing or lampooning you couldn't have picked a better mischoice of
words in this context.
Unless you
11 matches
Mail list logo