Re: [FRIAM] Slasdhot linked article RE; god

2015-01-07 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
And the skeptical response: https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/can-science-prove-the-existence-of-god-b6fefdc52588 Do you want or need your belief in a divine or supernatural origin to the Universe to be based in something that could be scientifically disproven? And so believers who

[FRIAM] Slasdhot linked article RE; god

2015-01-07 Thread Gillian Densmore
In light of the exuberant discussion started by about Athiesm. http://science.slashdot.org/story/14/12/30/2231220/science-cannot-prove-the-existence-of-god In case you don't like slashdot for valid reasons: Pro Seraphim however those wonderfully alien Kick Effing Arse Mother Effers are spelled:

Re: [FRIAM] Slasdhot linked article RE; god

2015-01-07 Thread glen
On 01/07/2015 12:22 PM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote: And so believers who avoid this trap must construct an origins story which cannot be falsifiable. It must be fantasy. (¬Falsifiable ↛ false) (fantasy ≢ counterfactual) -- ⇔ glen