“Transhumanism is a great Sci-Fi narrative, but not a good bet for us in the
long run.”
Well,
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep22555
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/06/01/science.aaf6850.full
FRIAM Applied
Hi Marcus or Robot Overload,
Tongue in cheek: How about early "retirement" packages to benefit the
surviving families? I certainly may have to consider this myself for my
kids' and grandkids' survival if the "offer" comes about. But I am
retired and not displaced ... but I may still seem like
If I were a robot overlord, and I didn’t want to look after 7 billion humans as
pets, I’d start offering advanced medicine and genetic enhancements to “early
users”, esp. the rich and powerful. The results of these could be things like
open-ended lifespan (ongoing repairs to aging bodies) and
Getting back to Tom's original theme about how AI is driving change, let's
examine that further, but now integrating in some of the other thoughts in
this thread such as: on the hegemonic nature of AI-- proprietary or open
source; or the societal impact of AI on the workforce--requisite skills
Fantastic! I love how they (he's the icon for an entire team) actually _do_
things to exhibit absurdity, rather than merely talking about it. I was
particularly fond of http://www.ourladyofperpetualexemption.com/ It's like an
extension of physical comedy ... organizational comedy? Loopy
Because it's a kind fun segment with John Oliver about America's enormous
problem with debts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxUAntt1z2c
Just thought some others might find it a fun segment.
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
https://medium.com/utopia-for-realists/why-do-the-poor-make-such-poor-decisions-f05d84c44f1a
was interesting, vis a vis what happens when you just give poor people
money.
-- rec --
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> I suspect a universal basic income
I suspect a universal basic income is a requirement for people to _not_ seek an
idle life.If people can't count on food, shelter, and health care, they
probably can't engage in anything in a substantial way.On the other hand,
saving the people that could do substantial things (and by
On that note, I found this article interesting:
A Universal Basic Income Is a Poor Tool to Fight Poverty
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/01/business/economy/universal-basic-income-poverty.html?_r=0
One of the interesting dynamics I've noticed is when I argue about the basic
income with people
Hi Pamela,
While open source gives some transparency, our direction is to move toward
more distributed AI where our data is not given to a centralized authority
before the AI is applied. Rather, we think that the AI should be more out
at the edge of the network with our
Roger,
Can artificial flowers learn?
Are you on your boat, yet? Beautiful day on Massachusetts bay! See
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/eaus/flash-vis.html
By the way, in support of your aphorism “layers of the atmosphere don’t mix”
which I have been chewing on ever since you
The field of AI itself has had a major project underway for a couple of years
to address these issues. It’s called AI 100, and is funded by one of the
wealthy founders of the field, Eric Horowitz at Microsoft. The headquarters of
this project are at Stanford University.
It is funded for a
Nah, we’re just a media for representing knowledge. Not a obviously a very
efficient one, either. I mean, wasting all that time in school, only to
forget much of it and then hopefully become a professional expert in some tiny
area. And a lot of people won’t even accomplish that, but
Well, my interpretation of Pamela's concern would have more to do with
[bio]diversity than it does some form of naive extinction threat. In previous
posts, I've outlined my skepticism that (complicated) open source is any less
opaque to understanding than proprietary sources because the
There is a large group of distinguished people including Elon Musk, Stephen
Hawking, Bill Joy and Martin Rees, who believe that AI is an existential threat
and the probability of the human race surviving another 100 years is less than
50/50. Stephen Hawking has said he has no idea what to do
15 matches
Mail list logo