young men are single. Most young
women are not.
There is a skewness in the various analyses of these things (in the sense of
two lines of non-common direction embedded in enough dimensions that they never
meet) that makes the various claims unusable unless one will not be lazy. That
puts it out of
The biggest not-accounted-for cost is human. All those kids in lithium mines
earning 12 cents a day.
davew
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023, at 3:41 AM, Santafe wrote:
> There is a skewness in the various analyses of these things (in the
> sense of two lines of non-common direction embedded in enough
> d
There is a skewness in the various analyses of these things (in the sense of
two lines of non-common direction embedded in enough dimensions that they never
meet) that makes the various claims unusable unless one will not be lazy. That
puts it out of my reach.
Rees, Seibert, and the others, ha
I did a calculation based on a steady growth rate followed by
extinction and anthropic reasoning (aka as the "doomsday argument"),
and came up with a 50% chance of population collapse by 2100. This was
based on 2005 population figures. See appendix B of my book "Theory of
Nothing". I haven't bother
Yeah. Bill Rees and Meghan Seibert want 90% of us to die
https://www.realgnd.org/people
(or a position paper somewhere in their writings).
On their people page, you can see what happy ecologists they are, and BIll is a
friendly old grandfather with a beard.
I shouldn’t be snotty. I think they
A few really do want our species to go extinct, but many believe that we
are already overpopulated and need to level off or reduce population. I
lean only slightly toward the latter.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 12:51 PM Frank Wimberly wrote:
> Agreed. But if we don't construct any new ones and the
Agreed. But if we don't construct any new ones and the existing ones
all die (they will) we will run out. Is that a reasonable goal?
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:20 AM glen wrote:
> We do not need more people. We have plenty of people. Please stop
> constructing people. >8^D
>
> On 2/22/23 09:16
We do not need more people. We have plenty of people. Please stop constructing
people. >8^D
On 2/22/23 09:16, Frank Wimberly wrote:
I am worried however. I have two grandsons in their 20s. Each has a
girlfriend. Those young women want nothing to do with babies. I assume they
have younger
I am worried however. I have two grandsons in their 20s. Each has a
girlfriend. Those young women want nothing to do with babies. I assume
they have younger siblings. I hope that as they enter their 30s their
attitudes will change because of the realization that they are running out
of time.
I think the keyword was young.
You can do that if the old men are all married to young women.
> On Feb 22, 2023, at 12:02 PM, Nicholas Thompson
> wrote:
>
> Last time I checked, the average number of attached males has to equal the
> average number of attached females, unless, of course, fema
10 matches
Mail list logo
