Re: [FRIAM] Tripping on the Rye: She's a Witch! How do you know? . (Re: basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of anthropological observtions)

Stephen writes: < Though if you listen closely, it was already offered right before "duck" :-) > Ah ha! Only my subconscious picked it up, I guess. :-) Marcus From: Friam on behalf of Stephen Guerin Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 12:37 PM To: The Friday

Re: [FRIAM] Tripping on the Rye: She's a Witch! How do you know? . (Re: basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of anthropological observtions)

Marcus, Yes, Lead is a good guess. Though if you listen closely, it was already offered right before "duck" :-) https://youtu.be/zrzMhU_4m-g?t=157 On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:32 PM Marcus Daniels wrote: > How about lead? > > >

Re: [FRIAM] Tripping on the Rye: She's a Witch! How do you know? . (Re: basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of anthropological observtions)

How about lead? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/lead-in-americas-water-systems-is-a-national-problem/ https://www.nrdc.org/resources/whats-your-water-flint-and-beyond https://www.vox.com/2016/1/21/10811004/lead-poisoning-cities-us Marcus From: Friam on behalf of

Re: [FRIAM] Tripping on the Rye: She's a Witch! How do you know? . (Re: basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of anthropological observtions)

SG - > I was completely ignorant of the history/impacts of ergot >  before this thread. Fascinating! so now you have added (upped the game of) "ergot" to your argot! Language of thieves?!     https://grammarist.com/usage/argot-vs-ergot/ It might be notable

[FRIAM] Tripping on the Rye: She's a Witch! How do you know? . (Re: basis for prediction — forked from the tail end of anthropological observtions)

I was completely ignorant of the history/impacts of ergot before this thread. Fascinating! In this context, we can think about Dave's different ways of knowing when we show cause and evidence that someone is a witch. 1. Science: