On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 07:32 -0400, Eric Smith wrote:
> I bet the reactor is the power plant in this:
> http://www.trendhunter.com/trends/zero-helicopter-concept
> which makes it so small and elegant.
At 19388kW, http://www.aviastar.org/helicopters_eng/mi-12.php
At 10kW,
http://agentsofshield
://aviationweek.com/technology/skunk-works-reveals-compact-fusion-reactor-details
-J.
Sent from my Tricorder
Original message
From: Roger Critchlow
Date:16/10/2014 02:28 (GMT+01:00)
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] 100 MW fusion reactor in 7x10 foot
Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] 100 MW fusion reactor in 7x10 foot footprint, 10
years to deployment
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/15/lockheed-breakthrough-nuclear-fusion-energy
-- rec --
FRIAM
Hmm I though fusion was supposed to be neigh impossible something to do
with not a net gain in energy.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/15/lockheed-breakthrough-nuclear-fusion-energy
>
> -- rec --
>
>
>
>
Orbitable.
On 10/15/14, 6:28 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/15/lockheed-breakthrough-nuclear-fusion-energy
-- rec --
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at c
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/15/lockheed-breakthrough-nuclear-fusion-energy
-- rec --
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailm
