Sorry for the last post.
I hadn’t read the link below in this one yet.
I will now get back to the work I was supposed to have been doing.
Eric
> On Feb 10, 2023, at 2:22 PM, glen wrote:
>
> This was laugh out loud funny for me. YMMV.
>
> Arguing with AI: My first dispute with Microsoft’s br
h that makes them so
different is still hard for me to see.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Friam On Behalf Of Santafe
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 3:11 AM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT is not very smart...
could devote more and more resources to different
>> hypotheses so long as it was not energy constrained.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Friam On Behalf Of Santafe
>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 3:11 AM
>> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffe
ge-
> From: Friam On Behalf Of Santafe
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 3:11 AM
> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT is not very smart...
>
> So probably this has all been analyzed to death already, by people who,
> unlike me,
3:11 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT is not very smart...
So probably this has all been analyzed to death already, by people who, unlike
me, know what they are talking about.
But in re-reading it, I feel like the structure of the probl
This was laugh out loud funny for me. YMMV.
Arguing with AI: My first dispute with Microsoft’s brilliant and boneheaded
Bing search engine
https://www.geekwire.com/2023/arguing-with-ai-my-first-dispute-with-microsofts-brilliant-and-boneheaded-new-bing-search-engine/?mc_cid=e4cf83ee41&mc_eid=d5c1
From the New Yorker article Russ posted:
"If a compression program knows that force equals mass times acceleration, it can discard a
lot of words when compressing the pages about physics because it will be able to reconstruct
them." ... "Perhaps arithmetic is a special case, one for which large
So probably this has all been analyzed to death already, by people who, unlike
me, know what they are talking about.
But in re-reading it, I feel like the structure of the problem is
characterizable.
It is as if “facts” that are constraints on the sentences to be composed are
ordered in a wa
age From: Sarbajit Roy Date:
2/4/23 1:55 PM (GMT+01:00) To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee
Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT is not very smart... I
was asked to check out https://bhagavadgita.ai/ , a ChatGPT powered website
by its developers.This is my conversationK
that have four-letter
> names:
>
> Iowa, Ohio, Utah, Maine, Texas, Idaho, Hawaii, Peru (Not in the US)
>
> Remarkable. And Palm from Google has 5x more parameters than ChatGPT.
>
> -J.
>
> ---- Original message ----
>
> From: Barry MacKichan barry.mackic...@m
examples of internal
consistency checks – filters – that should always be applied. Before dropping
into full gaslighting mode..
*From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
*Sent:* Thursday, February 2, 2023 12:21 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
*Subject:* Re: [
onsistency checks – filters – that should always be applied. Before dropping
into full gaslighting mode..
*From:* Friam *On Behalf Of *Jochen Fromm
*Sent:* Thursday, February 2, 2023 12:21 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT is not ver
Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT is not very smart...
It is remarkable that it is able to understand texts to this degree at all. And
it is just as stubborn and stupid as we are, isn't it? What if we are large
language models ourselves? :-/
I've asked it the sam
7 PM (GMT+01:00) To: The
Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject:
[FRIAM] ChatGPT is not very smart...
or is obsessed with four-letter words. From an email from another group.
Paragraphs with an initial capital are ChatGPT’s responses. The others are
input:
Chat GPT dialog, c
Coffee Group
Subject: [FRIAM] ChatGPT is not very smart...
or is obsessed with four-letter words. From an email from another group.
Paragraphs with an initial capital are ChatGPT’s responses. The others are
input:
Chat GPT dialog, courtesy of Paul Ginsparg:
“how many states in the united
That's a hilarious example. But to some extent, it argues that ChatGPT has
passed the Turing test. If I had a dime for every mansplaining know-it-all who
refused to acknowledge they'd made a mistake, I'd be pretty wealthy. Witness:
Hustle bros are jumping on the AI bandwagon
https://www.theverg
or is obsessed with four-letter words. From an email from another group.
Paragraphs with an initial capital are ChatGPT’s responses. The others
are input:
Chat GPT dialog, courtesy of Paul Ginsparg:
“how many states in the united states have four letter names?
“There are actually two states
17 matches
Mail list logo
