of its parents.
N
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:33 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
John,
wrt statement #2
Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
Of course you are correct.
If the Mother is X1+X2, and the Father is X3+Y, I seem to recall vaguely
that the Mother's X contribution is essentially a string of snippets from
X1 and X2, whereas the Father contributes either a pure
X3 or a pure Y
...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Nicholas Thompson
Sent: March-17-12 1:24 PM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
Sarbajit,
You're talking about the sex, chromosome only, right?
You're implying that crossing over does not occur between the homologous
...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Sarbajit Roy [sroy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 2:06 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
Of course you are correct.
If the Mother is X1+X2, and the Father is X3+Y, I seem to recall
vaguely
Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
W.r.t to your pointwise comments to John's points.
This to me seems a clear case of reinventing the wheel.
It also seems that the inventors do not know that the wheel has been invented.
Referring to at least 5,000 years of evolved human
to me?
--John
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Sarbajit Roy [sroy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 1:09 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See
-boun...@redfish.com [friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Sarbajit Roy [sroy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 2:22 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
Lets take those points 1 by 1
1) Information is transmitted genetically
ancestors?
--John
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of
Sarbajit Roy [sroy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 2:22 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See
Of Sarbajit Roy
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:33 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
John,
wrt statement #2
IF our ancestors are contained within us AND live (on) in us, THEN all
the information we have is in our ancestors too. {Life
, appear in the
FRIAM archive.
So, here it is again, in case anyone else missed it.
From: Nicholas Thompson [mailto:nickthomp...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:23 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: RE: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
Thanks
]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:23 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: RE: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
Thanks for writing, John.
You missed the most important objection. Genes are not the object of greed.
They are not analogous to coins, in reverse
This is just the abstract .. is it sufficient?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Nicholas Thompson
nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote:
Robert, ‘n all,
** **
Here is an electronic version of the E.O. Wilson interview that irked me,
courtesy of Frank Wimberly. I get irked by U.S. Mail.
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 9:10 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
This is just the abstract .. is it sufficient?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012
, 2012 9:57 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
Definitely not. The full article is in the March 5 issue.
Frank
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz
Santa Fe, NM 87505
mailto:wimber...@gmail.com wimber...@gmail.com
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?
But, Nick, later in the article it says, “…even as Wilson campaigned for
sociobiology, he began to grow dismayed with the scientific framework that made
it possible. ‘I noticed that the foundations
Robert, 'n all,
Here is an electronic version of the E.O. Wilson interview that irked me,
courtesy of Frank Wimberly. I get irked by U.S. Mail.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/03/05/120305fa_fact_lehrer
Nick
16 matches
Mail list logo