Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-17 Thread Sarbajit Roy
of its parents. N -Original Message- From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:33 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? John, wrt statement #2

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-17 Thread Nicholas Thompson
Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? Of course you are correct. If the Mother is X1+X2, and the Father is X3+Y, I seem to recall vaguely that the Mother's X contribution is essentially a string of snippets from X1 and X2, whereas the Father contributes either a pure X3 or a pure Y

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-17 Thread Vladimyr Burachynsky
...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Thompson Sent: March-17-12 1:24 PM To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? Sarbajit, You're talking about the sex, chromosome only, right? You're implying that crossing over does not occur between the homologous

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-17 Thread John Kennison
...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy [sroy...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 2:06 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? Of course you are correct. If the Mother is X1+X2, and the Father is X3+Y, I seem to recall vaguely

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-16 Thread John Kennison
Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? W.r.t to your pointwise comments to John's points. This to me seems a clear case of reinventing the wheel. It also seems that the inventors do not know that the wheel has been invented. Referring to at least 5,000 years of evolved human

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-16 Thread Sarbajit Roy
to me? --John From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy [sroy...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 1:09 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-16 Thread John Kennison
-boun...@redfish.com [friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy [sroy...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 2:22 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? Lets take those points 1 by 1 1) Information is transmitted genetically

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-16 Thread Sarbajit Roy
ancestors? --John From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Sarbajit Roy [sroy...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 2:22 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-16 Thread Nicholas Thompson
Of Sarbajit Roy Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:33 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? John, wrt statement #2 IF our ancestors are contained within us AND live (on) in us, THEN all the information we have is in our ancestors too. {Life

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-15 Thread Nicholas Thompson
, appear in the FRIAM archive. So, here it is again, in case anyone else missed it. From: Nicholas Thompson [mailto:nickthomp...@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:23 AM To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' Subject: RE: [FRIAM] FW: See this? Thanks

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-15 Thread Sarbajit Roy
] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:23 AM To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' Subject: RE: [FRIAM] FW: See this? Thanks for writing, John. You missed the most important objection. Genes are not the object of greed. They are not analogous to coins, in reverse

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-11 Thread Owen Densmore
This is just the abstract .. is it sufficient? On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Nicholas Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote: Robert, ‘n all, ** ** Here is an electronic version of the E.O. Wilson interview that irked me, courtesy of Frank Wimberly. I get irked by U.S. Mail.

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-11 Thread Frank Wimberly
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 9:10 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? This is just the abstract .. is it sufficient? On Sat, Mar 10, 2012

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-11 Thread Sarbajit Roy
, 2012 9:57 AM To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? Definitely not. The full article is in the March 5 issue. Frank Frank C. Wimberly 140 Calle Ojo Feliz Santa Fe, NM 87505 mailto:wimber...@gmail.com wimber...@gmail.com

Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-11 Thread ERIC P. CHARLES
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' Subject: Re: [FRIAM] FW: See this? But, Nick, later in the article it says, “…even as Wilson campaigned for sociobiology, he began to grow dismayed with the scientific framework that made it possible. ‘I noticed that the foundations

[FRIAM] FW: See this?

2012-03-10 Thread Nicholas Thompson
Robert, 'n all, Here is an electronic version of the E.O. Wilson interview that irked me, courtesy of Frank Wimberly. I get irked by U.S. Mail. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/03/05/120305fa_fact_lehrer Nick