Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard

2015-02-05 Thread Nick Thompson
Of glen Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 9:21 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard On 02/04/2015 04:18 PM, Owen Densmore wrote: Love this tweet: I'm really glad Google is so performance based in its product strategy. It's a far cry

Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard

2015-02-05 Thread glen
On 02/04/2015 04:18 PM, Owen Densmore wrote: Love this tweet: I'm really glad Google is so performance based in its product strategy. It's a far cry from wasteful and obsolete old school practices that pour lots of resources into a narrow channel, artificially maintaining zombie products. It

Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard

2015-02-05 Thread Arlo Barnes
The desktop thingy was OK, and Wave looked promising, but really the only one I cared about was Sidewiki. -Arlo James Barnes FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe

Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard

2015-02-05 Thread Owen Densmore
- From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of glen Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 9:21 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard On 02/04/2015 04:18 PM, Owen Densmore wrote: Love this tweet: I'm really glad Google

Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard

2015-02-05 Thread Sarbajit Roy
Google's products are highly intrusive. Whenever I use them I feel as though I'm a lab rat in somebody's experiment. http://www.google.com/policies/privacy/ On 2/5/15, Owen Densmore o...@backspaces.net wrote: It's only fair to say the google ecology is converging to some degree and is pretty