Steve Smith wrote at 05/01/2013 06:00 PM:
This seems like another form of tragedy around the commons?
I view all this the same way I view laws and selective enforcement by
DAs and LEOs. Laws are there to provide options for the LEOs to
selectively choose who to suppress. (As with our
I think you answer your own questions, right? The reason for people's
(false) expectations regarding computers like set top boxes or webcams
is _because_ of your latter argument. If the goal is a clear security
model, then when I install a webcam on my TV, I expect a clear security
model, not
This Is the Most Detailed Picture of the Internet Ever (and Making it
Was Very Illegal)
http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/this-is-most-detailed-picture-internet-ever
The resultant map isn't perfect, but it is beautiful. Based on the
parameter's of the researcher's study, the map is already on its
Very Interesting in many dimensions (technical/social/...) here's what I
believe to be the original paper.
http://internetcensus2012.bitbucket.org/paper.html
This Is the Most Detailed Picture of the Internet Ever (and Making it
Was Very Illegal)
Me parece increíble que 420.000 usuarios de Linux sean tan descuidados y no
le presten el mínimo de atención a la más básica medida de seguridad como
es tener un password para ingresar al perfil. También es interesante ver
el nivel de acceso de Linux en todo el mundo.
2013/5/1 glen e p ropella
On 5/1/13 12:22 PM, Alfredo Covaleda Vélez wrote:
Me parece increíble que 420.000 usuarios de Linux sean tan descuidados
y no le presten el mínimo de atención a la más básica medida de
seguridad como es tener un password para ingresar al perfil. También
es interesante ver el nivel de acceso
On 5/1/13 9:54 AM, glen e p ropella wrote:
This Is the Most Detailed Picture of the Internet Ever (and Making it
Was Very Illegal)
http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/this-is-most-detailed-picture-internet-ever
The resultant map isn't perfect, but it is beautiful. Based on the
parameter's of the
I can't help but wonder why we don't extend the virus (or infection)
metaphor all the way out. The way viruses interact with our bodies is
pretty !@#@$@ complex. I don't know of any naturally occurring viruses
that are (purely) beneficial. But there are many that are, in some
sense, neutral.
Glen -
I can't help but wonder why we don't extend the virus (or infection)
metaphor all the way out. The way viruses interact with our bodies is
pretty !@#@$@ complex. I don't know of any naturally occurring viruses
that are (purely) beneficial. But there are many that are, in some
sense,
On 05/01/2013 03:06 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
You might have known her during your time at SFI?
Last time I had an in-depth visit with her was maybe 2007 and I'm sure a
great deal has happened since! It seemed like a lot was funded by DARPA
at the time and therefore some of that wasn't being
In Berkeley ca 2005, if I felt sluggish (I mean my internet),
I can imagine a more urban area being more problematic. I've heard that
some ISPs include restrictions on wifi sharing in their terms of service
agreements:
On 5/1/13 6:16 PM, glen e p ropella wrote:
http://w2.eff.org/Infrastructure/Wireless_cellular_radio/wireless_friendly_isp_list.html
Per my last question of how is a mesh network to get started,
propogate, etc.? the list above *does* address this somewhat...
You might have known her during
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 07:00:12PM -0600, Steve Smith wrote:
On the other hand, my experience with PacBell suggests these folks
felt that may have felt they had no good options.PacBell
required that I sign a 12 month agreement to get internet... even
though I told them I only planned to
On 5/1/13 3:39 PM, glen e p ropella wrote:
I would think we might
extend the infection metaphor deeper and develop layers and
sub-systems of different sorts of immunity against botnet, worm, and
virus infections. But some of them, perhaps running BOINC or like this
mapping botnet, could be
14 matches
Mail list logo
