Re: [FRIAM] Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart

2012-12-03 Thread Gillian Densmore
Complexity Coffee Group > Cc: Mike Collins > Sent: Mon, Dec 3, 2012 9:40 am > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - > In One Pie Chart > > Fascinating. Unfortunately, we don't have a similar, sound, list of > preventative method

Re: [FRIAM] Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart

2012-12-03 Thread Paul Paryski
: Mike Collins Sent: Mon, Dec 3, 2012 9:40 am Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart Fascinating. Unfortunately, we don't have a similar, sound, list of preventative methods. I'm told, for example, nuclear electricity generation

Re: [FRIAM] Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart

2012-12-03 Thread Owen Densmore
Fascinating. Unfortunately, we don't have a similar, sound, list of preventative methods. I'm told, for example, nuclear electricity generation is on the + side, vastly less contaminating, weather wise, than most current sources. The spent fuel problem is being solved by interesting reuse in the

[FRIAM] Why Climate Deniers Have No Scientific Credibility - In One Pie Chart

2012-12-02 Thread Tom Johnson
FYI http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/11/15/why-climate-deniers-have-no-credibility-science-one-pie-chart -tj FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, map